Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39273)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1ZrPvV-0002Wd-Kn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:34:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1ZrPvU-0007K5-Qu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:34:01 -0400
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:33:52 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20151028123352.GG3836@noname.str.redhat.com>
References: <cover.1445964094.git.berto@igalia.com>
	<20151028093301.GB3836@noname.str.redhat.com>
	<w51eggf9r3u.fsf@maestria.local.igalia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <w51eggf9r3u.fsf@maestria.local.igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] Test the reopening of overlay_bs in
	'block-commit'
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

Am 28.10.2015 um 12:20 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Wed 28 Oct 2015 10:33:01 AM CET, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > I've applied your test case to my working branch so I won't forget
> > about this. Maybe I should really try to get the series into 2.5 then.
> 
> Note that 2.4 is also affected by this. I guess for that version we can
> simply swap the order of the bdrv_reopen_queue() calls. I can prepare a
> patch if you're ok with that solution.

Okay. Then I'd suggest that you send a series with the swap and the test
case, CC qemu-stable, and we'll just apply that for now. And I'll keep a
note to look into the bdrv_reopen() part.

Kevin