From: Marek Vasut Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:54:51 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: socfpga: Fix cache configuration In-Reply-To: <5666C74D.5080008@denx.de> References: <1442503829-28882-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <20151208111323.GA5801@amd> <5666C74D.5080008@denx.de> Message-ID: <201512081354.51327.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tuesday, December 08, 2015 at 01:04:29 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 08.12.2015 12:13, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>>>> Usage: > >>>>> ubifsmount > >>>>> > >>>>> - mount 'volume-name' volume > >>>>> > >>>>> In the mean time, I was not able to get ubifsmount works. > >>>>> Appreciate > >>>>> for any quick advise? Else will look into the code tomorrow as my > >>>>> bed > >>>>> is calling me :) > >>>> > >>>> I usually write ubinized image into the "rootfs" partition (sf erase > >>>> and > >>>> then sf write) and then do 'ubi part rootfs' , which fails with error > >>>> 22 > >>>> unless I revert this patch. If I dump the SPI NOR area after writing > >>>> the > >>>> data, I see that the last 2 bytes of some pages are corrupted. > >>>> > >>>> I am using these parameters to generate my ~11MiB large ubinized > >>>> image: > >>>> MKFS_UBIFS_OPTS="-m 1 -e 65408 -c 200" > >>>> UBINIZE_OPTS="-m 1 -p 64KiB -s 1" > >>>> > >>>> Here is the content of my ubinize.cfg: > >>>> [rootfs] > >>>> mode=ubi > >>>> image=root.ubifs > >>>> vol_id=0 > >>>> vol_type=dynamic > >>>> vol_name=rootfs > >>>> vol_flags=autoresize > >>> > >>> Thanks for the pointers. > >>> > >>> I checked the source and enabled the debug message. Noticed my failure > >>> is due to small LEB and PEB size. It was set to 4k which is the sub > >>> -sector erase size of NOR flash. I suspect you didn't hit this as you > >>> generate ubinized image which is 64kB erase size. > >>> > >>> I will continue to dig more. Need to ensure it works when user create > >>> UBI part in U-Boot on top of serial NOR flash (which is commonly 4kB > >>> erase size). Hopefully existing U-Boot already have source taking care > >>> this :) > >> > >> I am tempted to revert this patch, since it breaks USB and UBI for me > >> on two different boards though. > > > > It caused regressions it was not supposed to change. That means > > revert... > > Yes, please revert and hopefully someone will find the time > to find and fix the problem with this dcache at some time. Me, already done, see the other email ;-) > Sorry for the inconvenience. But I didn't notice any problems > with it until now. You were just lucky ;-) Best regards, Marek Vasut