From: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] x86/efi: Print size in binary units in
 efi_print_memmap
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:14:25 +0100
Message-ID: <20160209131425.GB21762@gmail.com>
References: <1454364428-494-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <1454364428-494-15-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <56B0756E.9010603@redhat.com>
 <20160203104045.GB7310@gmail.com>
 <20160203112829.GC2597@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40295BF72A9F@G4W3202.americas.hpqcorp.net>
 <20160209122018.GA4178@gmail.com>
 <56B9E166.6030405@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56B9E166.6030405-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>, Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>, "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Taku Izumi <izumi.taku-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org


* Laszlo Ersek <lersek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> >> [    0.000000] efi: mem62: 0x0000001880000000-0x000000207fffffff (  32 GB) .N....BTCU "Reserved"
> 
> Sorry to disagree :), but I count myself somewhat intimate with UEFI
> (albeit more from the edk2 side), and while I can make sense of
> 
>   |NV|  |  |  |  |   |WB|WT|WC|UC]
> 
> I find
> 
>   .N....BTCU
> 
> mostly undecipherable. :)

Ok - the longer variant is fine to me as well.

Thanks,

	Ingo