From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] ASoC: es8328: Use more suitable definition for mic bias Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:12:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20160512111216.GD6261@sirena.org.uk> References: <20160509112437.8924-1-john@metanate.com> <20160509112437.8924-6-john@metanate.com> <20160510175335.GC6261@sirena.org.uk> <20160512120131.30a91984.john@metanate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EcSFpNr6Vcxykj4g" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160512120131.30a91984.john@metanate.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: John Keeping Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --EcSFpNr6Vcxykj4g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:01:31PM +0100, John Keeping wrote: > OK, this can be dropped. Would you consider doing something like the > patch below? Documentation/SubmittingPatches. --EcSFpNr6Vcxykj4g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXNGUOAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQYxsH/jGAw389JQAq9gD7axsVQyty xlOXcB1ykmBjG7lsPYWdqyQngNh2nazuU0vpL1QxqrG32FFzMETD4R8yWyQwQM64 S1GXO9OkpAuPziSn2S2TR1nU0IGJeKAgKk+8Z4SyWjgEHtf1i5NirZEtPDEN8yvH 8htnr4Gh8PLrgmUJN7zIhpch5C8oXlVlAlbE2uIJFo3glhAlvO5Swtdeg8Ym56AN 0EA0EM5vjPQu5teuf/bN1PB7cRPqjeaDrep0b72g+MOYm1ISTWq79S21vSFVJ69n kIHr4Lau6FB/JZrMrS6Hy/Hk5ioebPoJUQUYgWB3ThuAHgjj+l3p8TKmHFqpgxY= =USfY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EcSFpNr6Vcxykj4g--