Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 70B25E00E9A; Thu, 19 May 2016 14:42:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FSL_HELO_HOME,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 1.0 FSL_HELO_HOME FSL_HELO_HOME * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.125.82.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3474E00DBA for ; Thu, 19 May 2016 14:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n129so248478729wmn.1 for ; Thu, 19 May 2016 14:42:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gherzan-ro.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SbVQkix3fDImbUT6vGFLO+DprOfIcyVhb1Oqq4GPJ1Q=; b=oxz07fDPALKQ8vJ5+rZy7Vi+IUVbj/dABq99rXHSeqedgNsETDWHy5dXwsXiJpPWw/ 7qHr/zJz5W1bmlJ/rh6jnnoJQXAZpqVz+UKZRjyfcMFSgfoKEuNC16jS4m9wj28Rtrca 83RlWHMQ2+cCnyqJRLjwybyc9nLe4+jpNcmuYD2JhycR5GC+sjiKioq3Hi86oZ1/ENy6 YeGGQU0PEC9Ffkxvjfuzb1XpwpPTwIX09EASHZXYkX/RqMVF2oJKUY8gIIgOBWWZWe44 MEzAB+4rJFXfljAylmC9HgWi7KJVVJrOUeoaL2XdApn+rAAbePfVdIRWWCVw0aiAARoj Td4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SbVQkix3fDImbUT6vGFLO+DprOfIcyVhb1Oqq4GPJ1Q=; b=gBSreecZs31nKYzDHlR8szFVlrMeUcsiNHJcP7DF3+iHv9BBO2pcZlpnFdt4X7paCV KpWxN6qCtqC4xCiwfkhcBtXbvzAt/5EdPYJK0m01KS7zDj/I6JRmIKMqyG3YvI3eYLQZ KlkxTZNmIYKHN+jUawaHongXLPLSYug29NnX5hbNrSvR5H8dphuSr9N/XpXaSp4WHcxs gLLMp+CaB6aNdj9WcVHLidD0Ng0/V5sP0m8I4EwfEQF5THFJzz4hPwy5Sc+NkD8Rjnzc +8sAeJVKhjetWcX72wYFFT9uPe8rqqSOcqd/3yQ/MLpCkDUah2B1VeetdCdwwz5IRxQm hFAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW8kWNJAf9bzMdHk+Z9Led1YKJyVJ8ZDlK8BZsBRdCUNtNCuZRqBrLy7c1LvRQ4DQ== X-Received: by 10.28.211.10 with SMTP id k10mr38730179wmg.82.1463694159056; Thu, 19 May 2016 14:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resin.home (ip5f5acdbc.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de. [95.90.205.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w82sm1288008wmw.5.2016.05.19.14.42.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 May 2016 14:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 23:42:36 +0200 From: Andrei Gherzan To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20160519214236.GG9848@resin.home> References: <573DAE5A.6000707@elfin.de> <20160519143914.GA3601@resin.home> <573DDB17.5050007@elfin.de> <20160519152756.GE9848@resin.home> <9F9E2F05-CC7B-4F90-AAED-0B327C09B733@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9F9E2F05-CC7B-4F90-AAED-0B327C09B733@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][Question] How to build an hwup image for raspberrypi3 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 21:42:43 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 30091 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uc35eWnScqDcQrv5" Content-Disposition: inline --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:40:13AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On May 19, 2016, at 8:27 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:26:15PM +0200, piotr.lewicki wrote: > >> On 19.05.2016 16:39, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:15:22PM +0200, piotr.lewicki wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> I'm trying to build a Yocto image for raspberrypi3. > >>>> I'm using only two layers: > >>>> - poky (krogoth: rev eff84a76acea1a0842194106a66684511f409842) > >>>> - meta-raspberrypi (master: rev 9912d38e97671704822d1aa05312a0439cb650d3) > >>>> > >>>> I have built it by cloning both layers from git (and changing poky branch), > >>>> then I sourced poky (source poky/oe-init-build-env), added meta-raspberrypi > >>>> layer in conf/bblayers.conf and in conf/local.conf changed MACHINE to > >>>> raspberrypi3. > >>>> > >>> I just tested the same revisions as you mentioned and the board boot for > >>> me. How do you test the board? Over serial? > >>> > >>> If you are using serial I suspecte you are not setting the serial > >>> console. if you are using tty1 (hdmi) you need to add the specific > >>> console argument to cmdline. > >> I'm using hdmi. Where can I find those console arguments? > > > > Boot partition, cmdline.txt. > > > >>> > >>>> Then I have built "rpi-hwup-image" using bitbake and dd'd it to an SD card. > >>>> > >>>> Unfortunately rpi-hwup-image does not work on raspberry pi 3. > >>>> Boot screen halts when 4 raspberry logos show up and that's it. > >>>> > >>>> On the other hand I have tried the same SD card with raspberry pi 2 and it > >>>> booted up (!?). > >>>> > >>>> Can you tell me if there is still support for meta-raspberrypi layer? > >>>> I found that this layer does not follow Yocto project naming convention for > >>>> branches (I think that the latest is "jethro", but nothing newer besides > >>>> "master"). > >>>> Does this mean that there is no stable and up-to-date branch apart from > >>>> master? > >>>> > >>> What do you mean rpi is not following the yocto project naming > >>> convention? It does miss a branch for the last yocto release but there > >>> are already for the old ones. > >> Maybe I explained that wrong, but I've noticed that it's missing krogoth > >> branch. > >> I think that if something like this occurs users are a little bit confused > >> and have to choose between old branch (potentially outdated) and a master > >> branch (potentially unstable). > > > > Correct. I'll release krogoth too soon. Thanks. > > > I would suggest to delay branching until we really diverge from krogoth in incompatible ways > just makes it easier to maintain. Indeed. Sounds like a good idea. -- Andrei Gherzan --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXPjNIAAoJEHO76Gt+erfPL5kQAK0IomG2eMFS9dWioo1607K1 nShD8pwGuIpZYAIekT1BUKB7GboDJw5LSbQohMdfrCclqJ4tCmkOLSU6Exk6vKgr AaDcEu2LLde87pvPEgHmKUk2Z87T03oACIzZPVogxf1/UPxPVPOlyktWWpe4z06W fCHLhs8UQpyJHt9mCSxxLxX8LIPM0vBG2RSJAXT+tkU8eOJGJMr7RovMBp3dlQkZ Z/nFzhrVOgC/QxIYr4J6PEKLDC1LLeD7A5uslQtrI5KSPqm5TzwHhs3lS4SiLMaF GWgAZ1GcIgoJQTFAlu/78ypwLQ8WSVcVdDTgriuI3sT5RgHIN9ipjM0WiR49v6AM DMH2pIpdRZgvbrMBYsIZGAR/OGL+tLiHYKQzoJbaFo6KZbVMuRy9bH42lrNq7jRi G61KIqvPYUFIZBY2sEHuJQ7R1g1SnLStHs3MH6i8fcQbT6fvCo73YOWyhqWWMUs8 k26L1S7WqV/unBpYujlaNEaEAgFh1AVolfcAgcBziFbsB3g1Ip7a14xFA2kGuJOt Y5g0ILwiBrnSE8zSBXi7xQsgQCELshT5hTh3ELzNb0BnWpLxMs1gXNmQHCNgLHwV Qm7CnWwRxRE0SIwOO6xoQ9xG04QSoBCZfWDNZh4Axku8EPydsb/QsiylQtvbnflh bn7SxBvmUeNVgn1KHmgz =Jt+r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5--