Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 14:45:46 +0200 From: Gert Doering Message-ID: <20160522124546.GA53051@...1296...> References: <1463822525-2532-1-git-send-email-openvpn-devel@...2127...> <1463822525-2532-2-git-send-email-openvpn-devel@...2127...> <20160521095424.GQ53051@...1296...> <20160521111016.GS53051@...1296...> <9715E28C-0B26-4EAE-907A-B8A326BF98A7@...2127...> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VZoQXr/frJt+kLeJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9715E28C-0B26-4EAE-907A-B8A326BF98A7@...2127...> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Refactor t_client.sh List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jens Neuhalfen Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net --VZoQXr/frJt+kLeJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:38:05PM +0200, Jens Neuhalfen wrote: > [???] >=20 > > My buildbots test on "all the BSDs" (Free, Net, Open, and they have a > > /bin/sh which is "It only supports features designated by POSIX plus a = few=20 > > Berkeley extensions") and OpenSolaris 11 (ksh93). Samuli's buildbot > > test on various Linux variants, so "dash" should work. >=20 > Are these buildbots available vor the general public? Being able to easil= y test > lowers the bar for new contributors considerable. Right now, not for "general public". They auto-build (+test) every release that gets commited to "master" - which, of course, means "it is too late if it breaks platform ". We have discussed building from test branches (on-demand), and widening the access to these branches - but nothing specific has been decided yet. Maybe we should put that on the agenda for the monday meeting on May 30... - addition of new branches (at github), with more liberal commit rights - having the buildbots pull from github (right now they use sf, AFAIR) - opening the buildbot "build revision on platform " API for a wider circle (right now, I think only Samuli, David and I have access to that host, it's on private addresses in Samuli's VPN) I'm a bit reluctant giving "full user account" access rights to developers I have not met in person yet - but with the approach outlined above, at least sanity checking "I think the patch is good, will it break one of the more esoteric platforms?" will be possible. Samuli, are you listening? ;-) gert --=20 USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~ge= rt/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@...1296... fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@...1297... --VZoQXr/frJt+kLeJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQCVAwUBV0Gp+akuBuNlUUl1AQIRtwQAq/rD4GQLQ16jX9jf9wXaGBzgY06bB9BX YdQr/KzQszw37yM+L9J/SvR/IWNk/fDFsI40kMWihEh925IQwrahi1YBrdy0gjpG Lmml8OJx9eqGk3Nfz6Skf+UVm3hCCx7pNUuSrO0+JGwfIxT12H2xrtO1Gc+RYYN7 4NzWCf5HvaA= =OPaC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VZoQXr/frJt+kLeJ--