Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:50:28 +0200 From: Gert Doering Message-ID: <20160531065028.GL53051@...1296...> References: <1464638630-19744-1-git-send-email-samuli@...515...> <574CB60B.1060403@...2080...> <93fcbd96-76e8-557f-c42d-e5fa20034dc1@...515...> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HkHroYjkQwVPCEQE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93fcbd96-76e8-557f-c42d-e5fa20034dc1@...515...> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH v3] Clarify the fact that build instructions in README are for release tarballs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuli =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sepp=E4nen?= Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net --HkHroYjkQwVPCEQE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:45:12AM +0300, Samuli Sepp=E4nen wrote: > > Once we're at it, wouldn't it make sense to use this URL instead? > > > > >=20 > Yes, except that the URL is bound to change soon. I'm not sure what=20 > "soon" in this context means, because it depends more on other people=20 > than me. If we're fine with changing the URL again later, then I think=20 > the change you propose makes sense. In any case the URL should start=20 > with https instead of http. >=20 > Thoughts? Do the "proper" URL (with https) now, if it changes, update. gert --=20 USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~ge= rt/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@...1296... fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@...1297... --HkHroYjkQwVPCEQE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQCVAwUBV000M6kuBuNlUUl1AQKI1wP/SkBefjsMAqO8nM4CVcvqd1Ah+sFvM6Cm jdjeSyafXyHUxtb1k2LQKXw3GblF5+RvQP6x3NNv2158SsMNFoDuuN1w0gox1O7U /npPTCThBb6na1L56POxsARnjSm5Q+TjmlDkiUbWudD28Zvm6XzWfZPVbLk9h3+q Otc6IHCdHG0= =GUT5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HkHroYjkQwVPCEQE--