From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 23:43:57 +0200
Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH 4/4] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement options
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606102319480.2070@localhost6.localdomain6>
References: <1465591332-31113-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org>
 <1465591332-31113-5-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606102301090.2070@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <20160610211820.GG11948@wotan.suse.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606102319480.2070@localhost6.localdomain6>
Message-ID: <20160610214357.GA1650@katana>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> > Well, slightly better.
> 
> No, it should be much better.  You would have to look at the standard 

I use id-utils regularly and it is indeed at least a magnitude better.
The indexing often pays off already with the first coccinelle run for
me. Highly recommended.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/attachments/20160610/81592df8/attachment.asc>