Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.4 24/73] net: caif: fix misleading indentation Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:04:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20160928090436.281668789@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20160928090434.509091655@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20160928090434.509091655@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Arnd Bergmann commit 8e0cc8c326d99e41468c96fea9785ab78883a281 upstream. gcc points out code that is not indented the way it is interpreted: net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c: In function 'cfpkt_setlen': net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c:289:4: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Werror=misleading-indentation] return cfpkt_getlen(pkt); ^~~~~~ net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c:286:3: note: ...this 'else' clause, but it is not else ^~~~ It is clear from the context that not returning here would be a bug, as we'd end up passing a negative length into a function that takes a u16 length, so it is not missing curly braces here, and I'm assuming that the indentation is the only part that's wrong about it. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c +++ b/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ int cfpkt_setlen(struct cfpkt *pkt, u16 else skb_trim(skb, len); - return cfpkt_getlen(pkt); + return cfpkt_getlen(pkt); } /* Need to expand SKB */