From: Lukas Wunner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:10:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20161118091057.GA12168@wunner.de> References: <20161118011515.GB25762@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailout1.hostsharing.net ([83.223.95.204]:39377 "EHLO mailout1.hostsharing.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752189AbcKRJJf (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:09:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161118011515.GB25762@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andreas Noever , Keith Busch On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:15:15PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:52:06AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > Respin of this series to polish the runtime PM support for PCIe ports > > that was added with v4.8, and extend it to native hotplug ports: [snip] > I applied these to pci/pm for v4.10, thanks! > > I did make two changes to the changelog of the last patch: you > mentioned the "subordinate" bus, and I changed it to "secondary". We > have often used "subordinate" to refer to the immediately-downstream > bus, but that's slightly confusing because in the bridge spec, > "subordinate" means the highest bus number downstream from the bridge, > while "secondary" refers to the immediately-downstream bridge. Am I > making sense or confusing things more? Indeed the secondary bus was meant here and I used "subordinate" only because the attribute in struct pci_dev is named like this. :-) Thanks, Lukas