Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:47:48 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <201702201947.v1KJlmXL014209@...2054...> From: Gert Doering In-Reply-To: <20170131112131.13570-1-a@...2181...> References: <20170131112131.13570-1-a@...2181...> Subject: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: attempt to add IPv6 route even when no IPv6 address was configured List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net ACK. What we had was too strict in some cases, breaking people's configs - with this change, we give users enough rope to hang themselves if they insist to do so, but point out in the log file that this might be a stupid idea... (That this came up in the first place is a consequence of commit 86e2fa5597fd1ad8e, 2.3 "supported" this mode of operation "fine") Tested on linux - and it does the right motions. Whether or not "route6 without ifconfig6" does the right thing on platform is not something we guarantee or promise :-) Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.4 branch. commit 2b7650e7ec9241745e4f66c932d6cffaece927d7 (master) commit c74d574417b8b491fe6ad44e89843af8479cc9be (release/2.4) Author: Antonio Quartulli Date: Tue Jan 31 19:21:31 2017 +0800 attempt to add IPv6 route even when no IPv6 address was configured Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli Acked-by: Gert Doering Message-Id: <20170131112131.13570-1-a@...2181...> URL: https://www.mail-archive.com/openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg13994.html Signed-off-by: Gert Doering -- kind regards, Gert Doering