Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:47:59 +0100 From: Christian Hesse Message-ID: <20170222154759.46402df4@...1799...> In-Reply-To: <1b42bd0d-ffbf-8c09-e313-13474b723a16@...1856...> References: <11477a0a3cf636572c84e0110a6f1b726bc60c2c.1487368114.git.logout@...260...> <1b42bd0d-ffbf-8c09-e313-13474b723a16@...1856...> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/oYZJMfzjWCqB9Xi9Q_NFJhH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 09/15] OpenSSL: don't use direct access to the internal of X509_STORE_CTX List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Steffan Karger Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net --Sig_/oYZJMfzjWCqB9Xi9Q_NFJhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steffan Karger on Tue, 2017/02/21 22:30: > ACK. Changes look good and tested against OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0, 1.0.1 > and 1.0.2. You answered to a patch in the middle of a series. Does this ACK apply to t= he complete series or just this patch? --=20 main(a){char*c=3D/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/* Best regards my address: */=3D0;b=3Dc[a+= +];) putchar(b-1/(/* Chris cc -ox -xc - && ./x */b/42*2-3)*42);} --Sig_/oYZJMfzjWCqB9Xi9Q_NFJhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEXHmveYAHrRp+prOviUUh18yA9HYFAlitpJ8ACgkQiUUh18yA 9HY96ggAsZtq7A6M0GhCE30ipQUUhWOKkPsbFNMcd3GR+7Iyewyrp87+8bAPNJvI LZTxOUFRlaiq+IDZ7iLjaYo4vomn4bFFkLMPXhC2QxdQeeMFIk+gu/0jbqGcI4T+ ir1jZQh3V1vy1hSDENCZ2fXKlnZvQqsF+Jbl+x90FFUA3V0XgytRMF4WAvgQeyG3 9w80HqnQWg9WHod+qGtYvHAGJj9vw6wdHJ7wXL/rMci2U1o+kQwGA1g1nz2oM9l4 JjYwNQt9u4Tj1BHJ20wwbrSv7mW1qIQ+ZEekAKascKqPeD2ftq99WtEslVD+oPrh Z3N8CzYj93/Z9Ala8Ki+hcc3LCBpQw== =OCB8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/oYZJMfzjWCqB9Xi9Q_NFJhH--