From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:57:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize In-Reply-To: <7c6d6f3b-330c-ea6f-ad3f-65479354c94d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <58a0d919.08BhoypOnvRSLIqV%jsmart2021@gmail.com> <6a197069-2f10-6df1-4cf1-1a62808c8903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <7c6d6f3b-330c-ea6f-ad3f-65479354c94d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20170307195704.GB25619@kroah.com> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017@10:44:51AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote: > Hello stable kernel maintainers, > > On 03/07/2017 12:35 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable. > > > > Mauricio> This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at > > Mauricio> least. > > > > Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either > > you or James should mail stable at vger.kernel.org and request for the > > patches to be queued up. > > Can this commit be included on stable v4.4+ , please? (in Linus tree) > > 8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28 "scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ > creation for pagesize" I need an ack from a scsi maintainer that this is an ok thing to do before I can do so. thanks, greg k-h