From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 23:08:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/4] nvme-fabrics: add target support for TCP transport In-Reply-To: <5b315c79-53a4-090d-db5e-dbbc3f333793@solarflare.com> References: <5b315c79-53a4-090d-db5e-dbbc3f333793@solarflare.com> Message-ID: <20170310220827.GB25489@lst.de> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017@11:31:16AM +0000, Bert Kenward wrote: > Memory is currently allocated as zero-order pages. It's possible > that using higher order pages may be desirable, trading potential > allocation latency for less fragmented SKBs on transmit. FYI, that would be a useful optimization for RDMA as well. I know SCST had some sophisticated code for doing nice SGL allocations and caching, maybe it's time to get that upstream. Bart, is that something you'd be interested in looking into?