From: Tom Rini Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:03:38 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/14] uboot overlays, FIT image & unittest In-Reply-To: References: <1504555943-12893-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> Message-ID: <20170914010338.GA14526@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 06:53:17PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Pantelis, > > On 4 September 2017 at 14:12, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: > > This patchset allows uboot to handle overlays in a manner that uses > > a base DT blob and an arbitrary number of DT overlays blobs. > > > > While it is intended to be used with FIT images since handling a multitude > > of device tree blobs manually is a chore, manual fdt overlay application > > is supported and described. > > > > Changes since v2: > > * Addressed review comments by splitting patches and documenting methods. > > * Patch preserving extra configuration on fit-load > > > > The patchset is available at > > > > https://github.com/pantoniou/u-boot/tree/uboot-overlays > > > > and is against mainline u-boot as pulled today, 4/9/2017. > > > > Franklin S Cooper Jr (1): > > doc: overlays: Tweak documentation regarding overlays > > > > Pantelis Antoniou (13): > > Introduce fdt_setprop_placeholder() method > > fdt: Introduce helper method fdt_overlay_apply_verbose() > > fdt: Switch to using the verbose overlay application method > > fdt: Allow stacked overlays phandle references > > fit: Allow multiple images per property > > fit: Do not throw away extra configuration on fit_image_load() > > fit: Introduce methods for applying overlays on fit-load > > fit: fdt overlays doc > > doc: Document how to apply fdt overlays > > dtbo: make dtbos special > > config: sandbox: Add unit tests > > ut: fix fdt_getprop_u32() change > > test: overlay: Add unit test for stacked overlay > > I applied this series (to u-boot-fdt/testing) but it requires a later > version of dtc than we use in our travis tests: > > https://travis-ci.org/sglass68/u-boot/jobs/275239527 The -@ flag has been around for a long time, relatively speaking. Is there a problem in our .travis.yml perhaps where it's not picking up the dtc we're building from git? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: