Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 19:54:07 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@...1296...>
Message-ID: <20171203185407.GK69387@...1296...>
References: <20171202085438.2393-1-a@...2181...>
 <CAKuzo_h9kcCyDFqdyS50yeCt10n7jdjXm1Qmae+cVjWqYGrhUA@...278...>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bO4vSxwwZtUjUWHo"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKuzo_h9kcCyDFqdyS50yeCt10n7jdjXm1Qmae+cVjWqYGrhUA@...278...>
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH v2] ifconfig-ipv6(-push): allow using
 hostnames
List-Id: <openvpn-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/openvpn-devel>, 
 <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openvpn-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel>, 
 <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
To: Selva Nair <selva.nair@...277...>
Cc: "openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" <openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

--bO4vSxwwZtUjUWHo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,,

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:38:28PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> Responding to this old version just to be on record.
>=20
> I realized patch this was assigned to Gert on patchwork too late after
> started responding on my own. Sorry for jumping the gun. Have to make
> keeping an eye on patchwork a habit..
>=20
> I'll leave the latest v4 alone.

If that is the consequence of assigning patches to people on patchwork,
we should stop doing so (Antonio, are you listening? :-) ).  Obviously=20
the patch was in dire need of a good review, and if you have time while=20
I am busy with family things, this is more than welcome.

Voluntarily *taking* a patch for review is useful as a flag "I'm going to
handle this", but third-party-tagging "this is for Gert!" seems to have
potential for backfiring, so maybe we shouldn't do that, then.

(There currently is one patch in patchwork which I took myself, and that's=
=20
the "lowest metric interface" one)

gert

--=20
now what should I write here...

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@...1296...

--bO4vSxwwZtUjUWHo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WywN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bO4vSxwwZtUjUWHo--