From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] kill bond_ioctl()
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:48:37 +0100
Message-ID: <20180122164837.GE27216@lst.de>
References: <20180118193156.GC13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20180118193755.19997-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20180118193755.19997-5-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53361 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751116AbeAVQsj (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:48:39 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180118193755.19997-5-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 07:37:50PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> another sock_do_ioctl() equivalent

Except for the additional data copy.  Which might be worth mentioning
in the changelog.