Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:49:29 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/177] 4.9.90-stable review
Message-ID: <20180323164929.GD7794@kroah.com>
References: <20180323094205.090519271@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYuQJiRGZ+qVWcyiwj1FK41_Si_HaNtoYFCZNR+rupY6kw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYuQJiRGZ+qVWcyiwj1FK41_Si_HaNtoYFCZNR+rupY6kw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:20:00PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 23 March 2018 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.90 release.
> > There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Mar 25 09:41:28 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.90-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Great, thanks for testing these and letting me know.

greg k-h