Return-Path: Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 08:11:18 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Dechesne , Anibal Limon , Thierry Escande , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/102] 4.9.93-stable review Message-ID: <20180407061118.GF18744@kroah.com> References: <20180406084331.507038179@linuxfoundation.org> <20180406222524.dzzyzh3su3ytgh3u@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180406222524.dzzyzh3su3ytgh3u@xps> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:25:24PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:22:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.93 release. > > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Apr 8 08:42:55 UTC 2018. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. > > There is a new test failure on dragonboard 410c (arm64) in > kselftest/cpu-on-off-test. However, it looks like the test was failing > but giving a false "PASS" on previous versions of 4.9. This -RC seems to > have changed the behavior enough to cause the test to actually mark a > failure. > > In any event, this looks like a db410c-specific pre-existing issue that we have > already escalated to our Qualcomm team. Details can be found at > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723 for those interested. Thanks for testing these and letting me know. greg k-h