Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52777) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBrJI-0006hn-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:32:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBrJH-0006pZ-56 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:32:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:32:15 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20180427003215.GU29865@localhost.localdomain> References: <1521452376-25099-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <87bme62nu0.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <068649bc-1546-6fc5-3e41-63512196cbf8@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <068649bc-1546-6fc5-3e41-63512196cbf8@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests/device-introspect: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:20:25PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 26.04.2018 13:45, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Thomas Huth writes: > [...] > >> @@ -260,6 +263,26 @@ static void test_abstract_interfaces(void) > >> qtest_end(); > >> } > >> > >> +static void add_machine_test_case(const char *mname) > >> +{ > >> + char *path, *args; > >> + > >> + /* Ignore blacklisted machines */ > >> + if (g_str_equal("xenfv", mname) || g_str_equal("xenpv", mname)) { > >> + return; > >> + } > >> + > >> + path = g_strdup_printf("device/introspect/concrete-defaults-%s", mname); > >> + args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s", mname); > >> + qtest_add_data_func(path, args, test_device_intro_concrete); > > > > This runs test_device_intro_concrete() with "-machine M" for all machine > > types M, in SPEED=slow mode. > > > >> + g_free(path); > >> + > >> + path = g_strdup_printf("device/introspect/concrete-nodefaults-%s", mname); > >> + args = g_strdup_printf("-nodefaults -machine %s", mname); > >> + qtest_add_data_func(path, args, test_device_intro_concrete); > > > > This runs test_device_intro_concrete() with "-nodefaults -machine M" for > > all machine types M, in SPEED=slow mode. > > > > Has "without -nodefaults" exposed additional bugs? > > After testing this with all machines, I had to discover that > "-nodefaults" does not work so easily: A lot of the embedded machines > (especially the ARM machines) simply refuse to work with "-nodefaults" > and exit immediately instead. E.g.: > > $ arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -nodefaults -nographic -M n810,accel=qtest > qemu-system-arm: missing SecureDigital device > > So we'd either need a rather big black list for the machines that do not > work, or simply drop the "-nodefaults" tests from this patch. Or we could try to test all machines anyway, but not consider it an error if QEMU just does exit(1). Can the qtest C API give us that information? (Or we could simply let -nodefaults aside by now, and do this after we implement this test case in Python.) -- Eduardo