Return-path: <ak@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136])
	by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <ak@linux.intel.com>)
	id 1fGu14-0005Lr-UW
	for speck@linutronix.de; Fri, 11 May 2018 00:26:27 +0200
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 15:26:23 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] L1TFv4 0
Message-ID: <20180510222623.GI13616@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
References: <cover.1525900921.git.ak@linux.intel.com>
 <58f2834a-80f4-ae07-935a-b87eb7712126@suse.cz>
 <20180510080417.GG32366@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180510160722.GB13616@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <20180510165759.GC15817@pd.tnic>
 <20180510173518.GC13616@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805110009440.2101@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805110009440.2101@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: speck@linutronix.de
List-ID: <speck.linutronix.de>

> Well even if it will be embargoed for a long time, it still will be on top
> of the SSB stuff and logistically it's way simpler if you rebase the patch
> series on top of that instead of having anybody else doing it over and
> over.

Ok. Will do.

-Andi