From: tj at kernel.org (Tejun Heo) Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 13:02:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests In-Reply-To: References: <20180510163701.28936-1-guro@fb.com> <20180510183224.GP2368884@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20180511143228.GU2368884@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20180511162920.GV2368884@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <957d089f-7a88-9ff4-733a-8e082339720c@kernel.org> <20180511180342.GA20683@castle> Message-ID: <20180511200250.GW2368884@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > Yeah. I see that. You have a switch for the KSFT_ values. Since there is no > dependency on the cgroup tree, I would recommend having this patch go through > kselftest tree which is the normal process for tests anyway. > > This version is good and I can apply this to linux-kselftest next. I ran a > quick test and the Skip case looks good. > > TAP version 13 > selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol > ======================================== > 1..0 # Skipped: memory controller isn't available > not ok 1..1 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol [SKIP] > > > Tejun! Please send me your Ack. Sure, please feel free to add my ack. I'll revert the original patch from cgroup tree. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html