From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:01:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH net-next 2/2] sctp: add sctp_make_op_error_limited and reuse inner functions Message-Id: <20180514110123.GA5105@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <53909b1bd523d45a453431968fd1e03fd4be6196.1525017179.git.marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> <201804300849.DRgYHLmw%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20180430023421.GA4977@localhost.localdomain> <20180514074053.GA21079@yexl-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20180514074053.GA21079@yexl-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ye Xiaolong Cc: kbuild test robot , Xin Long , Neil Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich , linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 03:40:53PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > >> config: x86_64-randconfig-x006-201817 (attached as .config) > >> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0 > >> reproduce: > >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree > >> make ARCH=x86_64 > >> > >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >> > >> net//sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_make_op_error_limited': > >> >> net//sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1260:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'sctp_mtu_payload'; did you mean 'sctp_do_peeloff'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > >> size = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, size, sizeof(struct sctp_errhdr)); > >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> sctp_do_peeloff > >> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > >Seems the test didn't pick up the MTU refactor patchset yet. > > Do you mean your patchset require MTU refactor patchset as prerequisites? Yes. Thanks, Marcelo