From: Tom Rini Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 16:50:23 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] block: Enable block cache by default In-Reply-To: <7867a4ab-0e6f-abe1-c65b-9f01a1681285@denx.de> References: <20180518092253.24255-1-marex@denx.de> <7867a4ab-0e6f-abe1-c65b-9f01a1681285@denx.de> Message-ID: <20180519205023.GA13093@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 08:20:30PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 05/19/2018 04:36 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > On 18 May 2018 at 03:22, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > >> The recent ext4 cache discussion would indicate that the block cache > >> is a desired feature, yet hidden and not enabled most of the time. > >> Enable the block cache by default since it provides significant block > >> device access performance improvement and if there are some users who > >> cannot enable it ie. due to size limitations, those should disable it > >> explicitly in their board config. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > >> Cc: Simon Glass > >> Cc: Michal Simek > >> Cc: Tom Rini > >> --- > >> drivers/block/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass > > I was hoping to get some feedback ? So, as I was asking on IRC, can you show the code paths where this gets used outside of CONFIG_BLK and then really ext4/fat/btrfs as I do in my patch? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: