From: jgg@mellanox.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 09:30:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting
In-Reply-To: <6e9b09a2-6b17-c128-fad1-198db6059a62@mellanox.com>
References: <452bfcde-ee3c-a4e5-e2d0-43114099590a@mellanox.com>
 <20180528120359.GA13368@lst.de>
 <99191c8c-b03e-f40d-ffd9-a73e01d0ae2a@mellanox.com>
 <20180528163324.GF17491@mellanox.com> <yq1o9gz2mi1.fsf@oracle.com>
 <6c7335c1-1d59-f764-be46-9aab46eb8458@mellanox.com>
 <20180529192329.GJ18442@mellanox.com> <yq1a7si15a1.fsf@oracle.com>
 <20180529221943.GR18442@mellanox.com>
 <6e9b09a2-6b17-c128-fad1-198db6059a62@mellanox.com>
Message-ID: <20180530153036.GD30764@mellanox.com>

On Wed, May 30, 2018@11:07:17AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/30/2018 1:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2018@06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>
> >>Jason,
> >>
> >>>>we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
> >>>
> >>>Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> >>>case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> >>>this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> >>>to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> >>>series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> >>>dependencies!
> >>
> >>I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
> >>funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
> >
> >Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches
> >tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.
> 
> Yes sure. I'm sorry for the ping-pong, I've tried to cover this in the cover
> letter but I guess I should've mentioned specifically what patches goes
> through which tree.

Just in general don't send such a jumble of patches for multiple
maintainers under one cover letter. It is error prone to sort it out.

Jason