Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50981) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxeu-00042l-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:58:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxep-0005FK-Cy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:58:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxep-0005En-62 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:58:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:58:04 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20180629175804.GT7451@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180627160103.13634-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180627160103.13634-1-berrange@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] docs: add guidance on configuring CPU models for x86 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 05:01:03PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrang=E9 wrote: > With the recent set of CPU hardware vulnerabilities on x86, it is > increasingly difficult to understand which CPU configurations are > good to use and what flaws they might be vulnerable to. >=20 > This doc attempts to help management applications and administrators in > picking sensible CPU configuration on x86 hosts. It outlines which of > the named CPU models are good choices, and describes which extra CPU > flags should be enabled to allow the guest to mitigate hardware flaws. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang=E9 Queued, thanks! --=20 Eduardo