Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=192.55.52.151; helo=mga17.intel.com; envelope-from=vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41Qlgf2L5VzDqx6 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 03:00:30 +1000 (AEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jul 2018 09:59:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,338,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="71930595" Received: from mauery.jf.intel.com (HELO mauery) ([10.7.150.73]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2018 09:59:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:59:17 -0700 From: Vernon Mauery To: Jeremy Kerr Cc: Alexander Amelkin , OpenBMC Development Subject: ipmitool default interface Message-ID: <20180711165917.GH105329@mauery> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:00:33 -0000 I have seen several requests for help on this list that could have been avoided if the BMC internal ipmitool used dbus as its default interface. I do not think we are quite ready to upstream this commit or the actual interface, since the dbus interface will be changing as part of the refactor of ipmid's architecture. But for now, it makes sense to set the default interface as dbus. After I have finished working on the refactor, I will push the changes upstream and then we should be able to just run with a standard cross-compiled build of ipmitool. --Vernon