From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: Remove VLA usage Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:37:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20180718203725.GD20228@lunn.ch> References: <20180717041034.GA37382@beast> <20180719.053333.396851874410198344.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: keescook@chromium.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, s.mesoraca16@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, David.Laight@aculab.com To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180719.053333.396851874410198344.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:33:33AM +0900, David Miller wrote: > From: Kees Cook > Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:10:34 -0700 > > > From: Salvatore Mesoraca > > > > We avoid 2 VLAs by using a pre-allocated field in dsa_switch. We also > > try to avoid dynamic allocation whenever possible (when using fewer than > > bits-per-long ports, which is the common case). > > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180505185145.GB32630@lunn.ch > > Signed-off-by: Salvatore Mesoraca > > [kees: tweak commit subject and message slightly] > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > Florian and Andrew, please review. Last time there was some discussion of just always allocating it to make the code simpler. But the extra complexity is O.K. Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew