From: Jarkko Sakkinen Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:07:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC 09/12] mm: Restrict memory encryption to anonymous VMA's Message-Id: <20180910210716.GB26766@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: References: <84154fd2-7c27-0fd2-f339-15e144a5df49@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <84154fd2-7c27-0fd2-f339-15e144a5df49@intel.com> To: Dave Hansen Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" , "Schofield, Alison" , "dhowells@redhat.com" , "Shutemov, Kirill" , "keyrings@vger.kernel.org" , "jmorris@namei.org" , "Huang, Kai" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "Nakajima, Jun" On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:57:49AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 09/10/2018 11:21 AM, Sakkinen, Jarkko wrote: > >> +/* > >> + * Encrypted mprotect is only supported on anonymous mappings. > >> + * All VMA's in the requested range must be anonymous. If this > >> + * test fails on any single VMA, the entire mprotect request fails. > >> + */ > > kdoc > > kdoc what? You want this comment in kdoc format? Why? If there is a header comment for a function anyway, why wouldn't you put it to kdoc-format? /Jarkko