X-GM-THRID: 6620547167797903360 X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:3cd:: with SMTP id c13mr1006759itl.22.1541589472264; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 03:17:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a05:660c:b10:: with SMTP id f16ls3682172itk.9.canary-gmail; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 03:17:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5e9EFrV/QFKFxhD838F/56iDdOJF9GD965Fh/denOsEN6M6SQj+H73aQrWxS/UNCWzleA0l X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:205:: with SMTP id y5mr950891itj.30.1541589471255; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 03:17:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541589471; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ke9Up81YHuoYM0zGhVoNhhN5GjsCWKtLxDzOucvB3SAWMTrrzDwifrvP7SjPq6+DNd lFQ6SJr9sxoUPXn6M1mP5GIQ90SwQdJMIeQZLGlsDhjwx1Xq79TpcjQKcrKT2mhY47SS P2EOuofpB0IT3AaS4qbbwzOcsUMiD9q1hAsYrmzIaBe6XJM99s6L/qxuq9P7X+eomJkH 8JVVJpVoS5p+Mf+nJ5akuyHzKXTu72SlGDxriVsOgtecerN4GYU5xdSK7y85mBlA/TOQ 3+b15q/e7x3gJHa+hUeDRdB4KbVm22PEPawsFjgQXWwoOLpJz3JtHHB4e4g1b5pa9rm2 EdvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=sHlrK9D5El2TxOMW3dIrtX9p9oqZjvTh2TVjdtd7Jh8=; b=K8iI9v7oJ9Nx9aWAwZY7FOYdzrHEQn696Egvhs1Oe25al4N/bHyhzx29hX1plUm8Cu 8ysk5iXK/DZWfhE2SuzmJB5TxgJ2yDLhLvaJnBbxstyyK5N2bxPzwadf9MtPK3IMoN3p ymI9oVaQhWeId1JwtszxiMfQBZiSASRjNqcmWi7+Kv/T+GRYB54H5gY8GHB/T4INouHV h2nSZ3T7G+Ria7PNc0PAnSG+NVCvXNv4bmL2P0wQvLCxaGOq2lFzQmQ8u9LHITw1AXgx lFOLGKb2iRDotZNUugerjEmE7mt+Pyx6AT70Xxy5RZwAq4Rmtg2hEXVaPMSRwu5Vv50G 9WIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=HmXZh3oI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of srs0=n9ky=ns=linuxfoundation.org=gregkh@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=n9kY=NS=linuxfoundation.org=gregkh@kernel.org" Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 68-v6si219046ita.0.2018.11.07.03.17.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Nov 2018 03:17:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of srs0=n9ky=ns=linuxfoundation.org=gregkh@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.145.29.99; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=HmXZh3oI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of srs0=n9ky=ns=linuxfoundation.org=gregkh@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=n9kY=NS=linuxfoundation.org=gregkh@kernel.org" Received: from localhost (unknown [104.153.224.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C42842085B; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:17:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541589470; bh=h4FDmUz0JnmAIfwLn0UuTgYEKrMhdmIADZCf8l3HwyA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HmXZh3oIHOI8BeNhT9hM90a4UgdmZ4SunO9IyyekATAeKAI/6sxg0m395RMdaxDEb yGYStspkiU3Th1FpIpbdntl+A46ruW+RO04emZuZ1nGuEntOs71IxBFART7AN3QCg2 6mXUNyka2qCkhGHbMBdCzjNnt97VLRE1PIQuK1gY= Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:17:39 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Ioannis Valasakis Cc: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] staging: greybus: fix various coding style issues Message-ID: <20181107111739.GA8006@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:04:06AM +0000, Ioannis Valasakis wrote: > Fix various coding style issues reported by reportcheck, uncrustify and > coccinelle. > > Ioannis Valasakis (15): > staging: greybus: shorten comparison to NULL > staging: greybus: align parameters to parentheses > staging: greybus: add a blank line after declaration > staging: greybus: fix SPDX License Identifier > greybus: staging: align arguments with parentheses Looks like your subject got switched around here. Again, doing a review of your email before sending it out is very good. v2? thanks, greg k-h