From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 16:18:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] ata: libahci_platform: comply to PHY framework In-Reply-To: <20181123101556.29888-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> References: <20181123101556.29888-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20181123101556.29888-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20181123151806.GC30913@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:15:50AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Current implementation of the libahci does not take into account the > new PHY framework. Correct the situation by adding a call to > phy_set_mode() before phy_power_on() and by adding calls to > ahci_platform_enable/disable_phys() at suspend/resume_host() time. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > --- > drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c > index 4b900fc659f7..9f33f72b674b 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c > @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ static int ahci_platform_enable_phys(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv) > if (rc) > goto disable_phys; > > + rc = phy_set_mode(hpriv->phys[i], PHY_MODE_SATA); > + if (rc) { > + phy_exit(hpriv->phys[i]); > + goto disable_phys; > + } Hi Miquel Russell King wrote a comphy driver for the Armada 3XX family. It only supports network PHYs. Did you check it does the right thing when passed PHY_MODE_SATA? This is slightly different to Hans's comment, in that i expect phy_set_mode() is implemented for the comphy driver, but it might not understand PHY_MODE_SATA and return an error? Maybe you should look at rc and keep going if EOPNOTSUPP is returned? Andrew