Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gShsp-0004nx-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:27:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gShsm-00066u-L8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:26:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gShsm-00066f-D4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:26:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AADF83D96D for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:26:50 -0200 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20181130122650.GE18284@habkost.net> References: <20181129185754.7009-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> <874lbzneoy.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874lbzneoy.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hostmem: Validate host-nodes before setting bitmap List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov , David Hildenbrand On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:37:49AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() was not validating > > host-nodes before writing to backend->host_nodes, making QEMU > > write beyond the end of the bitmap. > > > > Fix the crash and add a simple regression test for the fix. > > > > Reported-by: Markus Armbruster > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost > > --- > > backends/hostmem.c | 13 +++++++--- > > tests/acceptance/host-nodes-limit.py | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/host-nodes-limit.py > > > > diff --git a/backends/hostmem.c b/backends/hostmem.c > > index 1a89342039..ef199d32fd 100644 > > --- a/backends/hostmem.c > > +++ b/backends/hostmem.c > > @@ -103,11 +103,18 @@ host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, > > { > > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > > HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(obj); > > - uint16List *l = NULL; > > + uint16List *l, *host_nodes = NULL; > > > > - visit_type_uint16List(v, name, &l, errp); > > + visit_type_uint16List(v, name, &host_nodes, errp); > > + > > + for (l = host_nodes; l; l = l->next) { > > + if (l->value >= MAX_NODES) { > > + error_setg(errp, "Invalid host-nodes value: %d", l->value); > > + return; > > + } > > + } > > > > - while (l) { > > + for (l = host_nodes; l; l = l->next) { > > bitmap_set(backend->host_nodes, l->value, 1); > > l = l->next; > > } > > Pre-existing: leaks the list created by visit_type_uint16List(), or am I > confused? > > host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() looks like it leaks, too. > > The function to free such lists is qapi_free_uint16List(). Thanks, I will fix it in v2. > > > diff --git a/tests/acceptance/host-nodes-limit.py b/tests/acceptance/host-nodes-limit.py > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..e803e10104 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/acceptance/host-nodes-limit.py > > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ > > +# Regression test for host-nodes limit validation > > +# > > +# Copyright (c) 2018 Red Hat, Inc. > > +# > > +# Author: > > +# Eduardo Habkost > > +# > > +# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or > > +# later. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. > > + > > +from avocado_qemu import Test > > +from subprocess import Popen, PIPE > > + > > +MAX_NODES = 128 > > + > > +class HostNodesValidation(Test): > > + def test_large_host_nodes(self): > > + p = Popen([self.qemu_bin, '-display', 'none', '-nodefaults', > > + '-object', 'memory-backend-ram,id=m0,' > > + 'size=4096,host-nodes=%d' % (MAX_NODES)], > > + stderr=PIPE, stdout=PIPE) > > + stdout,stderr = p.communicate() > > + > > + self.assertIn(b'Invalid host-nodes', stderr) > > + self.assertEquals(stdout, b'') > > + self.assertEquals(p.returncode, 1) > > + > > + def test_valid_host_nodes(self): > > + p = Popen([self.qemu_bin, '-display', 'none', '-nodefaults', > > + '-object', 'memory-backend-ram,id=m0,' > > + 'size=4096,host-nodes=%d' % (MAX_NODES - 1)], > > + stderr=PIPE, stdout=PIPE) > > + stdout,stderr = p.communicate() > > + > > + self.assertIn(b'host-nodes must be empty', stderr) > > + self.assertEquals(p.returncode, 1) > > Perhaps this test should become part of a more comprehensive > menory-backend-ram test. If such a test existed, yes. > > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster Thanks! (Although this version is broken due to the extra "l = l->next" line and we need v2) -- Eduardo