Return-Path: From: Lars Ellenberg To: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:23:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20181220162344.8430-2-lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> In-Reply-To: <20181220162344.8430-1-lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> References: <20181220162344.8430-1-lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 01/17] drbd: narrow rcu_read_lock in drbd_sync_handshake List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Roland Kammerer So far there was the possibility that we called genlmsg_new(GFP_NOIO)/mutex_lock() while holding an rcu_read_lock(). This included cases like: drbd_sync_handshake (acquire the RCU lock) drbd_asb_recover_1p drbd_khelper drbd_bcast_event genlmsg_new(GFP_NOIO) --> may sleep drbd_sync_handshake (acquire the RCU lock) drbd_asb_recover_1p drbd_khelper notify_helper genlmsg_new(GFP_NOIO) --> may sleep drbd_sync_handshake (acquire the RCU lock) drbd_asb_recover_1p drbd_khelper notify_helper mutex_lock --> may sleep While using GFP_ATOMIC whould have been possible in the first two cases, the real fix is to narrow the rcu_read_lock. Reported-by: Jia-Ju Bai Reviewed-by: Lars Ellenberg Signed-off-by: Roland Kammerer --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c index 61c392752fe4..1b9822f264d2 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c @@ -3364,7 +3364,7 @@ static enum drbd_conns drbd_sync_handshake(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, enum drbd_conns rv = C_MASK; enum drbd_disk_state mydisk; struct net_conf *nc; - int hg, rule_nr, rr_conflict, tentative; + int hg, rule_nr, rr_conflict, tentative, always_asbp; mydisk = device->state.disk; if (mydisk == D_NEGOTIATING) @@ -3415,8 +3415,12 @@ static enum drbd_conns drbd_sync_handshake(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, rcu_read_lock(); nc = rcu_dereference(peer_device->connection->net_conf); + always_asbp = nc->always_asbp; + rr_conflict = nc->rr_conflict; + tentative = nc->tentative; + rcu_read_unlock(); - if (hg == 100 || (hg == -100 && nc->always_asbp)) { + if (hg == 100 || (hg == -100 && always_asbp)) { int pcount = (device->state.role == R_PRIMARY) + (peer_role == R_PRIMARY); int forced = (hg == -100); @@ -3455,9 +3459,6 @@ static enum drbd_conns drbd_sync_handshake(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, "Sync from %s node\n", (hg < 0) ? "peer" : "this"); } - rr_conflict = nc->rr_conflict; - tentative = nc->tentative; - rcu_read_unlock(); if (hg == -100) { /* FIXME this log message is not correct if we end up here -- 2.17.1