From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:02:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] NTB: test: remove a duplicate check Message-Id: <20190619060250.GH18776@kadam> List-Id: References: <20190619053205.GA10452@mwanda> <2f4dea74-d78e-8b53-8dec-df8dc032759c@deltatee.com> In-Reply-To: <2f4dea74-d78e-8b53-8dec-df8dc032759c@deltatee.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Jon Mason , Dave Jiang , Allen Hubbe , linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org It's not a huge deal obviously but your commit was a6bed7a54165 ("NTB: Introduce NTB MSI Test Client") but you know that if I had sent a patch called ("NTB: remove a duplicate check") people would have correctly complained because the patch prefix is too vague. What I'm saying is we do this all the time: [PATCH] NTB: add a new foobazle driver But it should be: [PATCH] NTB: foobazle: add a new foobazle driver Then I can just copy and paste your patch prefix instead of trying invent one. regards, dan carpenter