From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 06:10:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] docs: crypto: convert asymmetric-keys.txt to ReST Message-Id: <20200210071047.0db3f3a6@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: References: <1b6cd1da02dda27a725a6c4214019a1e306a7927.1581001737.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> <20200206200911.GA2830394@erythro.kitware.com> In-Reply-To: <20200206200911.GA2830394@erythro.kitware.com> To: Ben Boeckel Cc: list.lkml.keyrings@me.benboeckel.net, Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , David Howells , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:09:11 -0500 Ben Boeckel escreveu: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 16:11:21 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > - (1) If the criterion string is of the form "id:" then the = match > > + 1) If the criterion string is of the form "id:" then the = match =20 >=20 > This update was followed in all the enumeration changes except=E2=80=A6 >=20 > > - (2) If the criterion string is of the form ":" th= en the > > + 2) If the criterion string is of the form ":" the= n the =20 >=20 > The whitespace here doesn't match up. Which is preferred? That was a mistake. >=20 > > - (1) Signature verification. > > +1) Signature verification. =20 >=20 > Here, the indentation was lost too. Is this intentional? Both ways would work. I'll keep the original indentation for the next version. Thanks for pointing it. Cheers, Mauro