Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D562C00A89 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA98522268 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726788AbgKBQuf (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 11:50:35 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:17706 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727150AbgKBQue (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 11:50:34 -0500 IronPort-SDR: jOrDihpYXk+DapDX66BK4ctBV96zm//TwVM6UlWv8cN0E7jfPDCRQxRs01ws6HY0yhUqy2t2Lv nI0jR4efAtiw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9793"; a="230545713" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,445,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="230545713" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2020 08:50:33 -0800 IronPort-SDR: wFNEZC1oxgGuE8oPQ4DjP0OpoDQ9BnWkVTK/7Wuulzj8lIR9MwtVtplre6eUcZR/p4mNXmiAAk +CUqMjUtO7bg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,445,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="528080607" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2020 08:50:30 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kZd3M-003GMN-AI; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 18:51:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:51:32 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linus@black.fi.intel.com, Walleij@black.fi.intel.com, Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Hans de Goede , Jamie McClymont , Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpiolib: acpi: Respect bias settings for GpioInt() resource Message-ID: <20201102165132.GR4077@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20201022165847.56153-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20201022170319.GJ4077@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 04:41:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 07:58:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Missed comment as per v1: > > > > This one highly depends on Intel pin control driver changes (for now [1], > > but might be more), so it's probably not supposed to be backported (at least > > right now). > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20201014104638.84043-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/T/ > > I probably have to elaborate what above implies from integration p.o.v. > > I think the best way is to collect tags from GPIO maintainers and I > can incorporate this into our Intel pin control branch which I will > share with you as PR against GPIO and pin control subsystems. > > I'm also all ears for alternatives. Linus, Bart, what do you think about this series? (Linus, the patch 3/3 has been already applied by Bart as it's independent to ACPI anyway) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko