Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0174C001E0 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 20:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qW0T9-0001jJ-FO; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:16:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qW0T8-0001iT-8a for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:16:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qW0T4-00059C-VY for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:16:46 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6bcf2fd5d69so5180646a34.1 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; t=1692130602; x=1692735402; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Lo3i5N5BbKo6DP4yawS4oeiSuoKJHFlJGeBJBU9cGgc=; b=gmKq3fJjJzeUjvSGnsU7oCh34vwqmuckT9Bu3NFRHArW7gp6Qa+YSSq9ZmUCgWfzGN eZSpFB5MwI63HhQy5zQxzcRAS8HQX+gyQnFyt1Px+Hiod+fM7Hysac3PXuT5erkBS96L hZQsWG5NT3GGvZkRxnrJS4LjIr8nPVcsu7hNjZPEtMi8o2B663C+3/w2CHAAAsbN4oM3 ijgUVzWgrc8LAUEZTeyytfHlyjzjyqdl1Mwjg6ntE+vQwJn34AG4Ka/idV60X6eXUOS/ jYwT4nwg5z7CIQj+8zN0d04Cri/6F15jG5jXipx4e+0eiU/mjxSOjyTjTcHY8A2gnUCN zKRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692130602; x=1692735402; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Lo3i5N5BbKo6DP4yawS4oeiSuoKJHFlJGeBJBU9cGgc=; b=dDcXzkpUP1rOVB3eJga3k+M6Wth3Xt/+QImDoz9N8uX4Evxn5qVKpJgvfhmrpVEuht OUavXudzf1+C8OQLn4nPfD2SMVAKRqlOhHio3plyUKxcs+7uf7AMDJS5n3nd7VFtrXhB 8psRSJJJtqYRpopitf1kVi1ugn/WQ+F/ipcZZq6dRloYh4L59oMlghsu54OT7hjbUDwO 66VgBDzwuyo0QdPePDeehprtVav+5jvB72yBuxOkyYvj2AZN4VWQGzfNpv3oBDdcinrh aPi1p0lQkYarzJE9sFG3w89S84n6JfLsQ49yTaO3Fz4SUNcIYo/9P/1mBybYb26EM0hh mSpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwfyHc1C+GMnz2i0s6U8RhisLJfomobxr8jVfqkfnAS6wB4FbJY u72xm4fIzUs9FY4HdZObMd61cw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGXcxoL6ufyaRynV1T+E9EvKyBaUfKSUqnQcO2PsXCrtjamS4w9CNZZmBVjATPGvvEZb2EzEw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:6091:b0:1bf:440:a055 with SMTP id t17-20020a056870609100b001bf0440a055mr12901224oae.4.1692130602032; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grind.. (189-69-160-189.dial-up.telesp.net.br. [189.69.160.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o14-20020a056870e80e00b001bb5b2a958csm6658203oan.23.2023.08.15.13.16.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Aug 2023 13:16:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Henrique Barboza To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, bmeng@tinylab.org, liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn, zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, palmer@rivosinc.com, Daniel Henrique Barboza Subject: [PATCH v7 12/12] target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:15:59 -0300 Message-ID: <20230815201559.398643-13-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230815201559.398643-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> References: <20230815201559.398643-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e; envelope-from=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com; helo=mail-ot1-x32e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-riscv-bounces+qemu-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-riscv-bounces+qemu-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org The 'any' CPU type was introduced in commit dc5bd18fa5725 ("RISC-V CPU Core Definition"), being around since the beginning. It's not an easy CPU to use: it's undocumented and its name doesn't tell users much about what the CPU is supposed to bring. 'git log' doesn't help us either in knowing what was the original design of this CPU type. The closest we have is a comment from Alistair [1] where he recalls from memory that the 'any' CPU is supposed to behave like the newly added 'max' CPU. He also suggested that the 'any' CPU should be removed. The default CPUs are rv32 and rv64, so removing the 'any' CPU will have impact only on users that might have a script that uses '-cpu any'. And those users are better off using the default CPUs or the new 'max' CPU. We would love to just remove the code and be done with it, but one does not simply remove a feature in QEMU. We'll put the CPU in quarantine first, letting users know that we have the intent of removing it in the future. [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-07/msg02891.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis --- docs/about/deprecated.rst | 12 ++++++++++++ target/riscv/cpu.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst index 92a2bafd2b..4ced7427ac 100644 --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst @@ -371,6 +371,18 @@ QEMU's ``vhost`` feature, which would eliminate the high latency costs under which the 9p ``proxy`` backend currently suffers. However as of to date nobody has indicated plans for such kind of reimplementation unfortunately. +RISC-V 'any' CPU type ``-cpu any`` (since 8.2) +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The 'any' CPU type was introduced back in 2018 and has been around since the +initial RISC-V QEMU port. Its usage has always been unclear: users don't know +what to expect from a CPU called 'any', and in fact the CPU does not do anything +special that aren't already done by the default CPUs rv32/rv64. + +After the introduction of the 'max' CPU type RISC-V now has a good coverage +of generic CPUs: rv32 and rv64 as default CPUs and 'max' as a feature complete +CPU for both 32 and 64 bit builds. Users are then discouraged to use the 'any' +CPU type starting in 8.2. Block device options '''''''''''''''''''' diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index 592808939f..3930c85341 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -1470,6 +1470,11 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) RISCVCPUClass *mcc = RISCV_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev); Error *local_err = NULL; + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_RISCV_CPU_ANY) != NULL) { + warn_report("The 'any' CPU is deprecated and will be " + "removed in the future."); + } + cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err); if (local_err != NULL) { error_propagate(errp, local_err); -- 2.41.0