Received: from vmicros1.altlinux.org (vmicros1.altlinux.org [194.107.17.57]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44BC2260A for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.107.17.57 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710920788; cv=none; b=o500CvX3Ysp7T8OzrxjBORdEdusSaw4anu0OsxDQAU1KBvyCa6h+oJgMPTDmCjGvn4IOy3OLlw2wljf90iBx9LN0NgQfugDbF5BVx6hlkrMXCNGYFhI000fujyBDtT8Q1zMiInYCvs1qsTHPUmQkmXTq08fkde/4XN+acrzQnxg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710920788; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qiNthUfK8SyOecd48eR8RQcrqaWtBX1AeXuXRUP7pG0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iOQ3d7OEs4fsJOr9VPst4+YzF0ABUo7c8qQyes3xV5TnIZjFxoU+l6HbijWbpoSQiWXmUcrioDD49E2ZI4cfmjwr0eaoieEtq++gMEFOTG/r0o2hhkmer/G3vOosFJ3NPWSvOlQLfAKjP2v48rvz6s8+gijPZgqg2fZRvwRanw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=altlinux.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=altlinux.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.107.17.57 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=altlinux.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=altlinux.org Received: from imap.altlinux.org (imap.altlinux.org [194.107.17.38]) by vmicros1.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7AA72C8F5; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:46:16 +0300 (MSK) Received: from altlinux.org (sole.flsd.net [185.75.180.6]) by imap.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9550F36D015F; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:46:16 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:46:16 +0300 From: Vitaly Chikunov To: Joachim Vandersmissen Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ecc - update ecc_gen_privkey for FIPS 186-5 Message-ID: <20240320074616.ya2vmqsacu5tcslt@altlinux.org> References: <20240320051558.62868-1-git@jvdsn.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240320051558.62868-1-git@jvdsn.com> Joachim, On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:13:38AM -0500, Joachim Vandersmissen wrote: > FIPS 186-5 [1] was released approximately 1 year ago. The most > interesting change for ecc_gen_privkey is the removal of curves with > order < 224 bits. This is minimum is now checked in step 1. It is > unlikely that there is still any benefit in generating private keys for > curves with n < 224, as those curves provide less than 112 bits of > security strength and are therefore unsafe for any modern usage. > > This patch also updates the documentation for __ecc_is_key_valid and > ecc_gen_privkey to clarify which FIPS 186-5 method is being used to > generate private keys. Previous documentation mentioned that "extra > random bits" was used. However, this did not match the code. Instead, > the code currently uses (and always has used) the "rejection sampling" > ("testing candidates" in FIPS 186-4) method. > > [1]: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.186-5 > > Signed-off-by: Joachim Vandersmissen > --- > crypto/ecc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/crypto/ecc.c b/crypto/ecc.c > index f53fb4d6af99..3581027e9f92 100644 > --- a/crypto/ecc.c > +++ b/crypto/ecc.c > @@ -1416,6 +1416,12 @@ void ecc_point_mult_shamir(const struct ecc_point *result, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ecc_point_mult_shamir); > > +/* > + * This function performs checks equivalent to Appendix A.4.2 of FIPS 186-5. > + * Whereas A.4.2 results in an integer in the interval [1, n-1], this function > + * ensures that the integer is in the range of [2, n-3]. We are slightly > + * stricter because of the currently used scalar multiplication algorithm. > + */ > static int __ecc_is_key_valid(const struct ecc_curve *curve, > const u64 *private_key, unsigned int ndigits) > { > @@ -1455,16 +1461,11 @@ int ecc_is_key_valid(unsigned int curve_id, unsigned int ndigits, > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ecc_is_key_valid); > > /* > - * ECC private keys are generated using the method of extra random bits, > - * equivalent to that described in FIPS 186-4, Appendix B.4.1. > - * > - * d = (c mod(n–1)) + 1 where c is a string of random bits, 64 bits longer > - * than requested > - * 0 <= c mod(n-1) <= n-2 and implies that > - * 1 <= d <= n-1 Looks like method of extra random bits was never used. But I am not sure that reference to FIPS 186-5 is correct since it's about DSS while this function is only used for ECDH, which is perhaps regulated by NIST SP 800-186 and 800-56A. Still, 3.1.2 of 800-186 suggests that for 'EC key establishment' listed curves with bit lengths from 224 are allowed to be used. Thanks, > + * ECC private keys are generated using the method of rejection sampling, > + * equivalent to that described in FIPS 186-5, Appendix A.2.2. > * > * This method generates a private key uniformly distributed in the range > - * [1, n-1]. > + * [2, n-3]. > */ > int ecc_gen_privkey(unsigned int curve_id, unsigned int ndigits, u64 *privkey) > { > @@ -1474,12 +1475,15 @@ int ecc_gen_privkey(unsigned int curve_id, unsigned int ndigits, u64 *privkey) > unsigned int nbits = vli_num_bits(curve->n, ndigits); > int err; > > - /* Check that N is included in Table 1 of FIPS 186-4, section 6.1.1 */ > - if (nbits < 160 || ndigits > ARRAY_SIZE(priv)) > + /* > + * Step 1 & 2: check that N is included in Table 1 of FIPS 186-5, > + * section 6.1.1. > + */ > + if (nbits < 224 || ndigits > ARRAY_SIZE(priv)) > return -EINVAL; > > /* > - * FIPS 186-4 recommends that the private key should be obtained from a > + * FIPS 186-5 recommends that the private key should be obtained from a > * RBG with a security strength equal to or greater than the security > * strength associated with N. > * > @@ -1492,12 +1496,13 @@ int ecc_gen_privkey(unsigned int curve_id, unsigned int ndigits, u64 *privkey) > if (crypto_get_default_rng()) > return -EFAULT; > > + /* Step 3: obtain N returned_bits from the DRBG. */ > err = crypto_rng_get_bytes(crypto_default_rng, (u8 *)priv, nbytes); > crypto_put_default_rng(); > if (err) > return err; > > - /* Make sure the private key is in the valid range. */ > + /* Step 4: make sure the private key is in the valid range. */ > if (__ecc_is_key_valid(curve, priv, ndigits)) > return -EINVAL; > > -- > 2.44.0