From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 21:33:39 +0100 Subject: [v6 17/20] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add IBM Huygens BMC system In-Reply-To: References: <20240522192524.3286237-18-eajames@linux.ibm.com> <2fe45df6-01a2-488b-99fb-5ee20491554c@web.de> <910b18b7-3717-4087-b028-fcaf5f2a604b@linux.ibm.com> <398bf753-6701-4925-b814-781a68a75cc5@web.de> <20240523-rinse-sturdily-7c78d8517884@spud> Message-ID: <20240523203339.GS2118490@ZenIV> List-Id: To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Would you like to mention in the changelog that a hardware description > >> should be extended anyhow? > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94 > > > > You are talking absolute crap here. Stop harassing contributors with > > your inane comments. > > Why do you interpret my patch review contributions in this direction > when the official Linux development documentation provides special advice > on affected wording details? Your "contributions" are garbage in general, and this thread is not an exception. More specifically, you are picking an advice that is inapplicable, transforming it into a question and "contributing" the result. And your entire modus operandi fits that pattern - you spew random garbage and expect the contributors to spend their time and efforts on checking if your (contents-free) "advice" happens to make any sense. That. Is. Worthless. According to people who'd met you in person you *are* a member of our species, and I can't exclude the possibility that in some other environments you might be capable of sentience. Unfortunately, the kernel development is clearly not among those.