Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87798239E6C; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774277122; cv=none; b=VRvsBi4nlflP3ijcqMmyOfY+AJRLiUwqOzugwzAX4Uo2VJ/PgR9A6HLRUzAzh60Rmaw4ovHwWN14eRnKFPGJnHjwyRjd8bUL6fU1+QXRtTUb+HvckpFytj5DBw/24d9YdgtKAjw+PVPPHc8r5i2VeIbqHmhULteyv5Aike9ZvAA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774277122; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9lhQTnBdRLX4XSQcrTB+iLHuKL2uD4ww0Vrzc4ARzxs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=NtKZvDo5XuHnKxWwsxcAprUxMWs9z9oMtQLzhZdwmWYDnJ4dHgtku6M99jjwlge9Ut3F+YdgceBwVR+ik9GUNnBbTTJs8e3QUrsUZWv7erogKWdoqEKWGRcB5WM1DouShijAUAODeMrAnuoj7s3sNu94az0Os3Hj1/OpYQn+YUA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=oTUziF5H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="oTUziF5H" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AB74C4CEF7; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:45:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1774277122; bh=9lhQTnBdRLX4XSQcrTB+iLHuKL2uD4ww0Vrzc4ARzxs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oTUziF5HTwfPwkthDY/KaIQqjQwPUNOcqh7V0h5KvonPpt8qAA2TmVjYACy76AOXI xL0YsLjf2RaRm3zzO/ECZk0nPH9c5wrQEn0idXw5NCXZQwLOs9J7Ag9/poBs6S3xSH tlboa8ibJs1NrdPFH8wMbzb2BzcNG/Ot3Dvzxh8U= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Naveen N Rao , Michael Ellerman , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.12 326/460] powerpc64/bpf: Fold bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() into bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel() Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:45:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20260323134534.522595311@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260323134526.647552166@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260323134526.647552166@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Naveen N Rao [ Upstream commit 9670f6d2097c4f97e15c67920dfddc664d7ee91c ] Commit 61688a82e047 ("powerpc/bpf: enable kfunc call") enhanced bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() to handle calls out to module region, where bpf progs are generated. The only difference now between bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() and bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel() is in handling of the initial pass where target function address is not known. Fold that logic into bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() and rename it to bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel() to simplify bpf function call JIT code. We don't actually need to load/restore TOC across a call out to a different kernel helper or to a different bpf program since they all work with the kernel TOC. We only need to do it if we have to call out to a module function. So, guard TOC load/restore with appropriate conditions. Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241030070850.1361304-10-hbathini@linux.ibm.com Stable-dep-of: 01b6ac727296 ("powerpc64/bpf: fix kfunc call support") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 61 ++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -202,14 +202,22 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR()); } -static int -bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) +int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) { unsigned long func_addr = func ? ppc_function_entry((void *)func) : 0; long reladdr; - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kernel_text_address(func_addr))) - return -EINVAL; + /* bpf to bpf call, func is not known in the initial pass. Emit 5 nops as a placeholder */ + if (!func) { + for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); + /* elfv1 needs an additional instruction to load addr from descriptor */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1)) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); + return 0; + } #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PCREL reladdr = func_addr - local_paca->kernelbase; @@ -266,7 +274,8 @@ bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, u * We can clobber r2 since we get called through a * function pointer (so caller will save/restore r2). */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R2, bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), 8)); + if (is_module_text_address(func_addr)) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R2, bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), 8)); } else { PPC_LI64(_R12, func); EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12)); @@ -276,46 +285,14 @@ bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, u * Load r2 with kernel TOC as kernel TOC is used if function address falls * within core kernel text. */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R2, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernel_toc))); + if (is_module_text_address(func_addr)) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R2, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernel_toc))); } #endif return 0; } -int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) -{ - unsigned int i, ctx_idx = ctx->idx; - - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(func && is_module_text_address(func))) - return -EINVAL; - - /* skip past descriptor if elf v1 */ - func += FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE; - - /* Load function address into r12 */ - PPC_LI64(_R12, func); - - /* For bpf-to-bpf function calls, the callee's address is unknown - * until the last extra pass. As seen above, we use PPC_LI64() to - * load the callee's address, but this may optimize the number of - * instructions required based on the nature of the address. - * - * Since we don't want the number of instructions emitted to increase, - * we pad the optimized PPC_LI64() call with NOPs to guarantee that - * we always have a five-instruction sequence, which is the maximum - * that PPC_LI64() can emit. - */ - if (!image) - for (i = ctx->idx - ctx_idx; i < 5; i++) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); - - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); - - return 0; -} - static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out) { /* @@ -1102,11 +1079,7 @@ emit_clear: if (ret < 0) return ret; - if (func_addr_fixed) - ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr); - else - ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr); - + ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr); if (ret) return ret;