Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9387432E128; Wed, 20 May 2026 17:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779297018; cv=none; b=J4SFlnvdNfaQlPWOfCB6eNJTbxKn4HRDIe6QZ8rXECHsyRqE29ueFTSzL2C49o+05Vox8nbdq5RvYW0tFreFgFKGHk/kdMg38bHZhznDBcYEdEyMN8vjXqQ2PjCRQ8LAht5p/yGwb3NgjjTeV3hSpY+lFe2Ne/XRklN8KiT71zg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779297018; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fwRQIYIRid+Nk3JF5tkjxKiEglq0DpftlAI2xr20/bY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=paDgUFSwQ62YNRy9VduTvdyXofsF+BLzQxU2hhMFx6mLXMQNZVVBJ06io6XZtMcX4pQFGG9GZM+abD94W03w0dHO7ghpVrt5PRQOi1cKk8C1Igkrltyt0KLwKqek3VF+4Qimp9McNiw+/nOZIH5httfE+vUh0X+nJozoSNw5IfE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=jcxccukF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="jcxccukF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04BCC1F000E9; Wed, 20 May 2026 17:10:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1779297017; bh=RLgIOOfuscX9Syx2K8KM1nF+6B4VUgHzd+DRBu/O6jk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=jcxccukF+v77V3h61RyluaFHsj7apH+CGQMaJhBTB+n4fueBoOrgGN6mMrUNtU3dL zb53rSW5r7rJ4wDHbDSFk0vKmD60u1ZoTpDDPOgBV5dn94WXHIf7O7Ut8xQWAamFiu rIYfRuMaloi8AuU0g/QD8c39u/koIfRRavOv8HMY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Hasan Basbunar , Jakub Kicinski , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 7.0 1019/1146] page_pool: fix memory-provider leak in page_pool_create_percpu() error path Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 18:21:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20260520162211.291179932@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260520162148.390695140@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260520162148.390695140@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 7.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Hasan Basbunar [ Upstream commit 5ef343614db766acdc01c56d66e780a1b43c6ac6 ] When page_pool_create_percpu() fails on page_pool_list(), it falls through to its err_uninit: label, which calls page_pool_uninit(). At that point page_pool_init() has already taken two references when the user requested PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM: pool->mp_ops->init(pool) static_branch_inc(&page_pool_mem_providers); Neither is undone by page_pool_uninit(); both are only undone by __page_pool_destroy() (success-side teardown). The error path therefore leaks the per-provider reference taken by mp_ops->init (io_zcrx_ifq->refs in the io_uring zcrx provider, the dmabuf binding refcount in the devmem provider) plus one increment of the page_pool_mem_providers static branch on every failure of xa_alloc_cyclic() inside page_pool_list(). The leaked io_zcrx_ifq->refs in turn pins everything io_zcrx_ifq_free() would release on cleanup: ifq->user (uid), ifq->mm_account (mmdrop), ifq->dev (device refcount), ifq->netdev_tracker (netdev refcount), and the rbuf region. The leaked static branch increment forces all subsequent page_pool_alloc_netmems() and page_pool_return_page() callers to take the slow mp_ops branch for the lifetime of the kernel. Reachable via the io_uring zcrx path: io_uring_register(IORING_REGISTER_ZCRX_IFQ) /* CAP_NET_ADMIN */ -> __io_uring_register -> io_register_zcrx -> zcrx_register_netdev -> netif_mp_open_rxq -> driver ndo_queue_mem_alloc -> page_pool_create_percpu -> page_pool_init succeeds (mp_ops->init runs, branch++) -> page_pool_list fails (xa_alloc_cyclic -ENOMEM) -> goto err_uninit <-- leak The same shape applies to the devmem dmabuf provider via mp_dmabuf_devmem_init()/mp_dmabuf_devmem_destroy(). Restore the cleanup symmetry by moving the mp_ops->destroy() and static_branch_dec() calls out of __page_pool_destroy() and into page_pool_uninit(), so page_pool_uninit() is again the strict inverse of page_pool_init(). page_pool_uninit() has only two callers (the err_uninit: path and __page_pool_destroy()), so this preserves the single-call invariant on the success path while fixing the err path. The error path of page_pool_init() itself still skips the mp_ops cleanup correctly: mp_ops->init is the last action that takes a reference before page_pool_init() returns 0, so when it returns an error neither the refcount nor the static branch has been touched. Triggering the bug requires xa_alloc_cyclic() to fail with -ENOMEM, which under normal GFP_KERNEL retry behaviour is rare. It is deterministic under CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION with fail_page_alloc / xa fault injection, or under sustained memory pressure. The leak is silent: there is no warning, and the released kernel build continues running with a permanently-incremented static branch. Fixes: 0f9214046893 ("memory-provider: dmabuf devmem memory provider") Signed-off-by: Hasan Basbunar Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260428170739.34881-1-basbunarhasan@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/core/page_pool.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c index 265a729431bb7..8171d1173221b 100644 --- a/net/core/page_pool.c +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c @@ -327,6 +327,11 @@ static void page_pool_uninit(struct page_pool *pool) if (!pool->system) free_percpu(pool->recycle_stats); #endif + + if (pool->mp_ops) { + pool->mp_ops->destroy(pool); + static_branch_dec(&page_pool_mem_providers); + } } /** @@ -1126,11 +1131,6 @@ static void __page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool) page_pool_unlist(pool); page_pool_uninit(pool); - if (pool->mp_ops) { - pool->mp_ops->destroy(pool); - static_branch_dec(&page_pool_mem_providers); - } - kfree(pool); } -- 2.53.0