Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23D743BB687; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786975798; cv=none; b=DjmqReYdu4dg+zayOpeQLDdV9Jd8Bkv2b3lFZjVCK0hNxCKWV8D13kyXt4yZS3QX7BaUJDflZWjZGhZHzTnGyGqx4htOZRZm2GfuQdpYLLlG8So8UYQCwXIaT0IUZFEltbw/QAJ53LXAKZd8NR0DdsMW5VvEmGSSOBjeu3xK/dk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786975798; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AwfplqBPcPNtUOZVoNcRreFG5vna+bSAJS5olqRHUcY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=T5k8GOEW8TgalHylrLfM2WQ+6LdjOiq8cVtg3i6pBWoF3XyiFshsTAoM44aIS3iSPGb1wN4D6RVQPm/7w1YMH/WzU5rlc4pBYOErC744vro39axEJNhTWa0670y736RFuSogqHGRwDhdweyLj4A+8MI2McgxtbyAMKt3RdpuFv8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=fNu841j3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="fNu841j3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C6821F000E9; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:09:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1786975797; bh=6j4/Z8EFqZtHN6YoWXhmvTziJtBYsZJspcS2CfejDhU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=fNu841j3oZlgrkLkMoASDzdvs//VHrpJG6yfBrPNCLDWWRV+WnON5EAKzDORaVwvV IvAbWzdf9x6kEEgrpOl5vK3nTKsklryfeXErQ6oUtrlXzG4U0YXK5nn82J7LgztqFO iSCBleut5XKplKmXlD05uKxRqgpVuhHkciqRqV50= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, sashiko-bot@kernel.org, Oliver Hartkopp , stable@kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 113/389] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:29:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20260817132543.591428770@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 In-Reply-To: <20260817132538.796021292@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260817132538.796021292@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Oliver Hartkopp commit 3b762c0d950383ab7a002686c9136b9aa55d2d70 upstream. RX: an RX_SETUP update(!) for an existing op skipped can_rx_register() unconditionally, even when a concurrent NETDEV_UNREGISTER had already torn down its registration (op->rx_reg_dev == NULL). This silently did not re-enable frame delivery for that updated filter. bcm_rx_setup() now re-registers in that case, while leaving rx_ops with ifindex = 0 (all CAN devices) which never carry a tracked rx_reg_dev registered as-is. TX: bcm_notify() only handled bo->rx_ops on NETDEV_UNREGISTER, leaving tx_ops with an active cyclic transmission re-arming its hrtimer indefinitely to execute bcm_tx_timeout_handler(). Cancelling the hrtimer prevents the runaway timer and any injection into a later reused ifindex, since nothing else calls bcm_can_tx() for the op until an explicit TX_SETUP update re-arms it. Unlike bcm_rx_unreg(), which clears the tracked rx_reg_dev for rx_ops, the ifindex is intentionally left unchanged for tx_ops. bcm_tx_setup() always rejects ifindex 0, so clearing it would strand the op: neither a later TX_SETUP (bcm_find_op()) nor TX_DELETE (bcm_delete_tx_op()) could ever find it again, since both require an exact ifindex match. Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260708094536.DDF821F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260708154039.347ED1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ Fixes: ffd980f976e7 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol") Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260714-bcm_fixes-v15-9-562f7e3e42da@hartkopp.net Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/can/bcm.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c index 59fc7cee12f41f..3c4abb6397bc66 100644 --- a/net/can/bcm.c +++ b/net/can/bcm.c @@ -1234,6 +1234,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, struct bcm_sock *bo = bcm_sk(sk); struct bcm_op *op; int do_rx_register; + int new_op = 0; int err = 0; if ((msg_head->flags & RX_FILTER_ID) || (!(msg_head->nframes))) { @@ -1318,8 +1319,15 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, /* free temporary frames / kfree(NULL) is safe */ kfree(new_frames); - /* Only an update -> do not call can_rx_register() */ - do_rx_register = 0; + /* Don't register a new CAN filter for the rx_op update unless + * a concurrent NETDEV_UNREGISTER notifier already tore down + * the previous registration. In this case the receiver needs + * to be re-registered here so that this update doesn't + * silently stop delivering frames for the given ifindex. + * Ops with ifindex = 0 (all CAN interfaces) never carry a + * tracked rx_reg_dev and stay registered as-is. + */ + do_rx_register = (ifindex && !op->rx_reg_dev) ? 1 : 0; } else { /* insert new BCM operation for the given can_id */ @@ -1389,6 +1397,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, /* call can_rx_register() */ do_rx_register = 1; + new_op = 1; } /* if ((op = bcm_find_op(&bo->rx_ops, msg_head->can_id, ifindex))) */ @@ -1402,7 +1411,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, if (op->flags & SETTIMER) { /* set timers (locked) for newly created op */ - if (do_rx_register) { + if (new_op) { spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_rx_update_lock); op->ival1 = msg_head->ival1; op->ival2 = msg_head->ival2; @@ -1432,7 +1441,10 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT); } - /* now we can register for can_ids, if we added a new bcm_op */ + /* now we can register for can_ids, if we added a new bcm_op + * or need to re-register after a NETDEV_UNREGISTER tore down + * the previous registration of an existing op + */ if (do_rx_register) { if (ifindex) { struct net_device *dev; @@ -1462,18 +1474,32 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, err = -ENODEV; } - } else + } else { err = can_rx_register(sock_net(sk), NULL, op->can_id, REGMASK(op->can_id), bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm", sk); + } + if (err) { - /* this bcm rx op is broken -> remove it */ - bcm_remove_op(op); + /* newly created bcm rx op is broken -> remove it */ + if (new_op) { + bcm_remove_op(op); + return err; + } + + /* an existing op just stays unregistered. + * Cancel op->timer and (defensively) op->thrtimer. + * Other settings can't be reached until the next + * successful RX_SETUP. + */ + hrtimer_cancel(&op->timer); + hrtimer_cancel(&op->thrtimer); return err; } - /* add this bcm_op to the list of the rx_ops */ - list_add_rcu(&op->list, &bo->rx_ops); + /* add a new bcm_op to the list of the rx_ops */ + if (new_op) + list_add_rcu(&op->list, &bo->rx_ops); } return msg_head->nframes * op->cfsiz + MHSIZ; @@ -1689,11 +1715,19 @@ static void bcm_notify(struct bcm_sock *bo, unsigned long msg, case NETDEV_UNREGISTER: lock_sock(sk); - /* remove device specific receive entries */ + /* rx_ops: remove device specific receive entries */ list_for_each_entry(op, &bo->rx_ops, list) if (op->rx_reg_dev == dev) bcm_rx_unreg(dev, op); + /* tx_ops: stop device specific cyclic transmissions on the + * vanishing ifindex. Cancelling the timer is enough to stop + * cyclic bcm_can_tx() calls as there is no re-arming. + */ + list_for_each_entry(op, &bo->tx_ops, list) + if (op->ifindex == dev->ifindex) + hrtimer_cancel(&op->timer); + /* remove device reference, if this is our bound device */ if (bo->bound && bo->ifindex == dev->ifindex) { #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS) -- 2.53.0