Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68DC047CC73; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787243628; cv=none; b=Og2Jeg1e+yGaqBChjNvivReRcJdOBLj054KTokVGKFK3k4LgZ1Pr6h1dYYv3UrssBNJCQJS7Ar9cA+YSaKuQshQ2zzGu5Chgqgg6SzVIdx1x8UYmBKfpypvO1ffFz8ojdrmVlmcYmvHcvdIpcg7R0yDBlUP6jyQuIQmsE9wfJto= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787243628; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KmsyLaXEkLHIgYUjGo1K5nNHbCsVkqaEPeUkuM3ntf0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=hM4564QVmIRj3MAlBD+KWcaA8q+YTk4ll7z8Ki3MPdpDQkDQepCBpKe4+W18K05M3DRORXPMeuL1bwa8gHtcWtND1x0Iw/sqNcvhMaHkzCBD4VAfR4Oo6FNH0u3E31gY4hRgiKwUXCD91yHSyc7vJTy+3m5tRIqxAIfsbt9Qlck= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Nq83cLXx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Nq83cLXx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C37A71F000E9; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:33:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1787243627; bh=Bz9ck4BJICVUExriYCjSN5IaOYbSyCeeK+2M/1xoFzA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Nq83cLXx2kvi9fwfvJrk5J4PhfjIX9AQwYgICRZn8K4q9mhRRCc0LfS9JZzd10ROW Ua/D3XyVgPE8nOFi3/4w5K3A+BnbaIYuSlw8Csg7RwOGTu0JnZvFPtlO9yPdD631p2 7M6g0K35xHZSueB+rDe+SOKQlcOy4Uw1rWqg13CE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Ibrahim Hashimov , Namjae Jeon , Steve French , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.15 122/272] ksmbd: fix integer overflow in set_file_allocation_info() Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:55:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20260820145234.923706244@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 In-Reply-To: <20260820145231.229664293@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260820145231.229664293@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ibrahim Hashimov [ Upstream commit 1c0ae3df692ea2a4ce992f786346154e75a3f0d5 ] set_file_allocation_info() converts the client-supplied FILE_ALLOCATION_INFORMATION::AllocationSize into a 512-byte block count with: alloc_blks = (le64_to_cpu(file_alloc_info->AllocationSize) + 511) >> 9; AllocationSize is a fully client-controlled __le64 field; the only validation performed by the caller (smb2_set_info_file(), case FILE_ALLOCATION_INFORMATION) is that the fixed buffer is at least sizeof(struct smb2_file_alloc_info) == 8 bytes. The value itself is never range-checked before this arithmetic. When AllocationSize is close to U64_MAX (e.g. 0xffffffffffffffff), "AllocationSize + 511" wraps around mod 2^64 to a small number (0xffffffffffffffff + 511 = 510), so alloc_blks becomes 0. Since any existing regular file has stat.blocks > 0, the function then takes the "shrink" branch and calls: ksmbd_vfs_truncate(work, fp, alloc_blks * 512); /* == 0 */ silently truncating the file to size 0, even though the client asked to grow the allocation to (what looks like) the maximum possible size. The trailing "if (size < alloc_blks * 512) i_size_write(inode, size);" restore is guarded by a comparison that is never true once alloc_blks == 0, so the truncation is not undone. This lets an authenticated SMB client that already holds an open handle with FILE_WRITE_DATA on a file silently truncate that same file to size 0 via a single crafted SET_INFO(FILE_ALLOCATION_INFORMATION) request advertising a near-U64_MAX AllocationSize, even though the request asks to grow the file's allocation rather than shrink it. This is a functional/data-loss bug, not a privilege-boundary violation: the same client could already truncate the file via FILE_END_OF_FILE_INFORMATION or a plain write. Fix it by validating AllocationSize against MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, the same upper bound the VFS itself uses to reject unrepresentable file sizes, before doing the "+511" rounding, and rejecting oversized values with -EINVAL. Bounding AllocationSize to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE - 511 guarantees the "+511" addition cannot wrap, and that the subsequent "alloc_blks * 512" values passed to vfs_fallocate() and ksmbd_vfs_truncate() stay within a representable loff_t as well. No legitimate SMB client asks for an allocation size anywhere near 2^64 bytes, so this only rejects a value that was previously silently misinterpreted as zero. Runtime-verified on a v6.19 KASAN test stand: sending SET_INFO (FILE_ALLOCATION_INFORMATION) with AllocationSize = 0xffffffffffffffff against ksmbd now returns -EINVAL and leaves the target file's size unchanged, where the unpatched kernel truncated it from 4096 to 0 bytes. Fixes: e2f34481b24d ("cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ibrahim Hashimov Assisted-by: AuditCode-AI:2026.07 Acked-by: Namjae Jeon Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c +++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c @@ -5814,6 +5814,7 @@ static int set_file_allocation_info(stru */ loff_t alloc_blks; + u64 alloc_size; struct inode *inode; struct kstat stat; int rc; @@ -5826,7 +5827,19 @@ static int set_file_allocation_info(stru if (rc) return rc; - alloc_blks = (le64_to_cpu(file_alloc_info->AllocationSize) + 511) >> 9; + /* + * AllocationSize is fully client-controlled (the caller only + * validates the fixed 8-byte buffer length). Reject values that + * would overflow the "round up to 512-byte blocks" conversion + * below instead of silently wrapping it to a tiny block count, + * which would truncate the file to a size the client never + * asked for. + */ + alloc_size = le64_to_cpu(file_alloc_info->AllocationSize); + if (alloc_size > MAX_LFS_FILESIZE - 511) + return -EINVAL; + + alloc_blks = (alloc_size + 511) >> 9; inode = file_inode(fp->filp); if (alloc_blks > stat.blocks) {