Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7D83F7A9F for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787658597; cv=none; b=Z+h4BhdeTHwu1YZssumQm4LPMjSOmjroM0Je7HJDnVCsjuA0QMEtwoKEI8QokhdrSZhDr2rmGg9jJGEaYBQvmyGt5ndIa6Di59/UPfLjdCBelQoUNtQsElY7XoNvIFaC0Nw2JF+wE9ZpuOkPOhbElDxd2fS6S4RNiXoFmGYR3jk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787658597; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y3AwAmXdcq0bRMdOL+DcaKwNkGhmgrcUAVM7xrb94PQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=iK8m0+Xzok66lhhjSf6N9mcyK54vHAKA48h/kjqRd2CuxQCTsinjJ90lOESU2rOYwSqLRQB3ipLl2p1a+0MKylq3f5GGTxV9rq3IFe7t7g7WbdsyEqmojJdUTrinSKRMsAch0Fos1YNkKz9xtnFQl5DcR7/viNaVGQTt5VkjolU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PvlEzMms; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PvlEzMms" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F4361F00A3D; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:49:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787658591; bh=bgrWmaWYtWDgJWs9KY17drQtEHUF7poADXNbRVDd8NM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=PvlEzMmsQGfWLXk0BhXBC2Dxhei1Rg8yej7/g7a+wyeDzY5QFJqMdeoWl5Yr64dfz tUPAL0hwSAhAQl44K8ptXd+WUau31n3GYuGzS2V8TNjIlx16A1RUKuNTVKORcjn+oZ RVph7wDw95uhj6KJpTsAK/M1tLEEraSPi2aegIKHUdhnt54J1SZuShkaYYyiCyZ3O/ +t1mWW+155BGQlQlCRaw6oG7czQ0Kw7sgwpocpDgFnTsgSPXmIqd9hFavyQ2SsVGtd 1p5vGRmXN3pRjsPqKWRKVXzq8BgLZVUa6EKc5H9Rbh0zY8HnMKNO0nxQ0i0S+ah74R OelSVNQETPD7A== From: Sasha Levin To: Jia Yao Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, Gwan-gyeong Mun , Matthew Auld , =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18.y] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in VRAM on dGFX Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:49:32 -0400 Message-ID: <202608250012.1a23d959422d0fa2@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <2026082417-chill-banshee-11e4@gregkh> References: <2026082417-chill-banshee-11e4@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 08:10:49AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > Ah, it needed to be applied after a different one? Can you send these 3 > patches as a patch series, as that will tell us what order to apply them > in. Same for the 6.12 versions. Jia Yao, on top of the series formatting there is a second problem: the set as sent does not build on either branch. Patch 1 calls xe_guc_using_main_gamctrl_queues(), which has no definition on 6.18 or 6.12 - it only exists on 7.1. On 6.12 the same patch also uses XE_BO_FLAG_PINNED_NORESTORE, which is undefined there. -- Thanks, Sasha