Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC74544894 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788872351; cv=none; b=sMtu9qcwab/G2rX44thR7nUMIHX62yylzyOUJvPhwD5NiBti5aJj2PP9MO22u/oK4x2OHzHy60O9E952spcr10S4YGIvoZR5VkCsz/c5o94K/1OPyiQkwD8ISz2fNaWHnt/RWaG/+VWr5KBfcvx07J7f6BJ0aumwYbezPmdS4zo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788872351; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+IXRPg1w0sEum97fott1YcLJHZDABqPLNwNwetNu8HY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bzvrOv42NiKom/dxS8y/akcOIADOh+34HPKqfIiXK4Yx9rUwitJbBnKGz+k1uFAKk7T/2KD5eBgX39m+RwoMc5e2tv7KqLGQru90ZRqJC/AC34+nXW2rCUh2ZLPQZWrbJB8caZTpzaUVevvePY7G7haWYquRg9jHb+ICujSEZFk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=D519+CYX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="D519+CYX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A011F00A3D; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:59:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788872346; bh=yBWxfQ4q1Vg16sSsyL5QbktmQE1dQlLR8d/7G6oUk/0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=D519+CYX8Fop7acVBxB/MSb16wHl3XOw0RQdClMgon9dDu7An/Kgu/8vT9v71ZVRb UVrB33+jUaFPwKt3cs5P1YAqY3Q/n/niwcEMAgifqUza0twj2ISOKlu7HsSOJL5By7 17GVBDG5CvMggvSZWi7QQRFxUe5Upnle61m8Wk1GuVG54wNsS/LcdmSGiE82KVkH91 frpu11nvqLe317OV6zD2QuWw0H8d6JpLsRo+lY6veTQjb79MRyiQMcJVVZpOv8kQIN YXFddAn9R3S07i3YE2vIOCcmwsNnupIBHkxfVh3GPIKZntbt9717aieSz1JvKFaDlm EGN0kPnIn4l3Q== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bryam Vargas , Ming-Hung Tsai , Mikulas Patocka , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] dm array: validate array block headers on read Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 08:59:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20260908125903.2182068-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <2026090303-flyover-viscous-2098@gregkh> References: <2026090303-flyover-viscous-2098@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Bryam Vargas [ Upstream commit 2965787723084835b18dfe993cd450ebf5bd4540 ] array_block_check() validates blocknr and csum and nothing else, while node_check(), next to it, has bounded the structural fields since both were written. dm_array_cursor_next() takes its loop bound from the on-disk nr_entries and element_at() is unguarded pointer arithmetic, so a count larger than the block holds keeps the cursor in one block while the index grows past it and the read walks off the dm-bufio buffer -- dm_cache_load_mappings() drives it once per cache block at activation. Check the header against itself: reject a zero value_size, require max_entries to equal calc_max_entries() for that value_size and block size, and require nr_entries to fit. Equality rather than an upper bound, since a count below the real capacity trips BUG_ON() in fill_ablock() and trim_ablock(). Metadata dm-array writes satisfies all three. Fixes: 6513c29f44f2 ("dm persistent data: add transactional array") Suggested-by: Ming-Hung Tsai Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas Reviewed-by: Ming-Hung Tsai Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka [ retained Linux 6.6’s non-const validator callback signature due to the missing constification commit. ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c index b1fdfe53e9377..9663abdb91404 100644 --- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c +++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c @@ -38,6 +38,14 @@ struct array_block { */ #define CSUM_XOR 595846735 +/* + * Each array block can hold this many values. + */ +static uint32_t calc_max_entries(size_t value_size, size_t size_of_block) +{ + return (size_of_block - sizeof(struct array_block)) / value_size; +} + static void array_block_prepare_for_write(struct dm_block_validator *v, struct dm_block *b, size_t size_of_block) @@ -55,6 +63,7 @@ static int array_block_check(struct dm_block_validator *v, size_t size_of_block) { struct array_block *bh_le = dm_block_data(b); + uint32_t nr_entries, max_entries, value_size; __le32 csum_disk; if (dm_block_location(b) != le64_to_cpu(bh_le->blocknr)) { @@ -74,6 +83,26 @@ static int array_block_check(struct dm_block_validator *v, return -EILSEQ; } + nr_entries = le32_to_cpu(bh_le->nr_entries); + max_entries = le32_to_cpu(bh_le->max_entries); + value_size = le32_to_cpu(bh_le->value_size); + + if (!value_size) { + DMERR_LIMIT("%s failed: value_size is zero", __func__); + return -EILSEQ; + } + + if (max_entries != calc_max_entries(value_size, size_of_block)) { + DMERR_LIMIT("%s failed: max_entries %u invalid for value_size %u", + __func__, max_entries, value_size); + return -EILSEQ; + } + + if (nr_entries > max_entries) { + DMERR_LIMIT("%s failed: too many entries", __func__); + return -EILSEQ; + } + return 0; } @@ -138,14 +167,6 @@ static void dec_ablock_entries(struct dm_array_info *info, struct array_block *a on_entries(info, ab, vt->dec); } -/* - * Each array block can hold this many values. - */ -static uint32_t calc_max_entries(size_t value_size, size_t size_of_block) -{ - return (size_of_block - sizeof(struct array_block)) / value_size; -} - /* * Allocate a new array block. The caller will need to unlock block. */ -- 2.53.0