Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7DB2E7F39 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 01:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788917482; cv=none; b=FwvRIOHZ0cSZRSDt8At8dmHAWRD9jT6p9cRN/ueJryOzACvvftuwlzij1xg5Ildsf38iwKukEp93bdNv3vgR8z/PHpffiouK5Qlv1SS5FwjEwd3aCJ3CT6JNSsUMjzjyJO0mNfIr8jW3AfU+zpeYVovfbH5EzQX4W1p6AzyZwAI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788917482; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p6I/chCTruzzPD+X6JooA2jYoTcUV906LNP/+wB/HMY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=UOqh3M1ksEOP2f7Yqa7/MvB3XX/LyR6+8uo3Fq1JoI/94K/lmerzLPLbmiOKAMY5li81Qo0sw6qkXurd13xlZOeH5diov20Vc3Wn6FUlx6FDDjqe3zknd3o0PWeQFPyKz1OkeuyrJHWFV45J0hjqztWU82JquHQ4dLOcX/qwyoE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NClad9rX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NClad9rX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23D211F00AC4; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 01:31:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788917480; bh=sL/nhLJQBzfp1HBDn6QI/yF1qOBPDRPvfzb9A0xbnO0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NClad9rX3IFC+bHmVYGYwolXMzz5AFB/oudp1y9QF6K4Ba0K1M381wmTOft2gesNm fp+kDbOJ1Bf+fCBoHRCBFQi3914PMwi2aGO2Lc4qCj6zn6oec8AivfIgUOvYZ5THxZ k/p+1rRwlVLXhC/J8Xn6wZSQEwBbAgaxYDwx7LAF2rgLY4lJ2WkAiSaJfcccHPKggi qgzFSIrc3fWq0HEumaUDJMD+CqgmkZQ7HpcrpCOkrU6TLiepKYwkeCJ8k5bC9scHH4 PyZ7BCS3pV6vAk89K9bfffqc5ukN2juNA65f3S/HLnXCZ+GQiJboF94fyenihLgEU2 7po+ZzQ8//+uQ== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Chris Mason , Jeff Layton , Chuck Lever , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y 4/4] svcrdma: Reject Write/Reply chunks with segcount 0 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 21:31:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20260909013116.888180-4-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260909013116.888180-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <2026090343-customize-gorgeous-909c@gregkh> <20260909013116.888180-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Chris Mason [ Upstream commit 9808eb7656666acc7291bae9ab6b987bd16e47e0 ] A peer can send a Write or Reply chunk whose segcount field is zero. xdr_check_write_chunk() only rejects segcount > rc_maxpages, so zero passes the range check, and xdr_inline_decode(stream, 0) returns the current (non-NULL) cursor without advancing. The function returns true and pcl_alloc_write() then links a struct svc_rdma_chunk with ch_segcount == 0 onto rc_write_pcl or rc_reply_pcl. An earlier patch in this series made pcl_for_each_segment() safe for ch_segcount == 0, so this no longer drives the memory walk it used to. Rejecting the malformed frame at the decode boundary is still worthwhile as defense in depth: it keeps degenerate zero-segment chunks off the parsed chunk lists entirely, so any future consumer that walks ch_segments directly cannot observe one, and it makes the zero-floor easy to backport to trees where the macro change is more intrusive. RFC 8166 has no meaning for a Write/Reply chunk that describes no remote buffer, so no legitimate client is affected. xdr_check_reply_chunk() funnels Reply chunks through xdr_check_write_chunk() and inherits the same rejection. pcl_alloc_write() also links each chunk onto the parsed chunk list before filling its segment array. If a future change weakens the segcount-0 rejection, an incomplete chunk is visible to consumers during the fill loop. Reorder so that list_add_tail() follows the segment fill loop, ensuring only fully-populated chunks appear on the list. Fixes: 78147ca8b4a9 ("svcrdma: Add a "parsed chunk list" data structure") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Assisted-by: kres (claude-opus-4-7) Signed-off-by: Chris Mason Acked-by: Jeff Layton Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260526-rpc-kernel-bugs-v1-5-e251306ccca9@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_pcl.c | 2 +- net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_pcl.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_pcl.c index b63cfeaa29234..a1c61311714da 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_pcl.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_pcl.c @@ -213,7 +213,6 @@ bool pcl_alloc_write(struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt *rctxt, chunk = pcl_alloc_chunk(segcount, 0); if (!chunk) return false; - list_add_tail(&chunk->ch_list, &pcl->cl_chunks); for (j = 0; j < segcount; j++) { segment = &chunk->ch_segments[j]; @@ -225,6 +224,7 @@ bool pcl_alloc_write(struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt *rctxt, chunk->ch_length += segment->rs_length; chunk->ch_segcount++; } + list_add_tail(&chunk->ch_list, &pcl->cl_chunks); } return true; } diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c index 7214a3a7e1b83..f2a21bc1701ce 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c @@ -488,10 +488,13 @@ static bool xdr_check_write_chunk(struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt *rctxt) return false; /* Before trusting the segcount value enough to use it in - * a computation, perform a simple range check. This is an - * arbitrary but sensible limit (ie, not architectural). + * a computation, perform a simple range check. A zero + * segcount describes no remote buffer and is rejected so + * downstream consumers never see a degenerate ch_segcount==0 + * chunk. The upper bound is an arbitrary but sensible limit + * (ie, not architectural). */ - if (unlikely(segcount > rctxt->rc_maxpages)) + if (segcount == 0 || unlikely(segcount > rctxt->rc_maxpages)) return false; p = xdr_inline_decode(&rctxt->rc_stream, -- 2.53.0