From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>,
	Shay Drori <shayd@nvidia.com>,
	Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18 0912/1250] net/mlx5: Register SF resource on PF port representor
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 16:11:47 +0100
Message-ID: <20260917151616.717467009@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20260917151551.901433442@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20260917151551.901433442@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.69
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

6.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>

[ Upstream commit 4be8326d817e6d47f8446938408bb2001b799340 ]

The device-level "resource show" displays max_local_SFs and
max_external_SFs without indicating which port each resource belongs
to. Users cannot determine the controller number and pfnum associated
with each SF pool.

Register max_SFs resource on the host PF representor port to expose
per-port SF limits. Users can correlate the port resource with the
controller number and pfnum shown in 'devlink port show'.

Future patches will introduce an ECPF that manages multiple PFs,
where each PF has its own SF pool.

Example usage:

  $ devlink resource show pci/0000:03:00.0/196608
  pci/0000:03:00.0/196608:
    name max_SFs size 20 unit entry

  $ devlink port show pci/0000:03:00.0/196608
  pci/0000:03:00.0/196608: type eth netdev pf0hpf flavour pcipf
    controller 1 pfnum 0 external true splittable false
    function:
      hw_addr b8:3f:d2:e1:8f:dc roce enable max_io_eqs 120

We can create up to 20 SFs over devlink port pci/0000:03:00.0/196608,
with pfnum 0 and controller 1.

Signed-off-by: Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drori <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260407194107.148063-4-tariqt@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 7f26a5e8040b ("net/mlx5e: Move representor vnic reporter to eswitch devlink port")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.h |  4 ++
 .../mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c     | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.h
index c9555119a6617..e49c7df79f124 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.h
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ enum mlx5_devlink_resource_id {
 	MLX5_ID_RES_MAX = __MLX5_ID_RES_MAX - 1,
 };
 
+enum mlx5_devlink_port_resource_id {
+	MLX5_DL_PORT_RES_MAX_SFS = 1,
+};
+
 enum mlx5_devlink_param_id {
 	MLX5_DEVLINK_PARAM_ID_BASE = DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX,
 	MLX5_DEVLINK_PARAM_ID_FLOW_STEERING_MODE,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c
index cf88a106d80d7..37e52f29a8149 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/mlx5/driver.h>
 #include "eswitch.h"
+#include "devlink.h"
 
 static void
 mlx5_esw_get_port_parent_id(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct netdev_phys_item_id *ppid)
@@ -160,6 +161,32 @@ static const struct devlink_port_ops mlx5_esw_dl_sf_port_ops = {
 	.port_fn_max_io_eqs_set = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_set,
 };
 
+static int mlx5_esw_devlink_port_res_register(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
+					      struct devlink_port *dl_port)
+{
+	struct devlink_resource_size_params size_params;
+	struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = esw->dev;
+	u16 max_sfs, sf_base_id;
+	int err;
+
+	err = mlx5_esw_sf_max_hpf_functions(dev, &max_sfs, &sf_base_id);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	devlink_resource_size_params_init(&size_params, max_sfs, max_sfs, 1,
+					  DEVLINK_RESOURCE_UNIT_ENTRY);
+
+	return devl_port_resource_register(dl_port, "max_SFs", max_sfs,
+					   MLX5_DL_PORT_RES_MAX_SFS,
+					   DEVLINK_RESOURCE_ID_PARENT_TOP,
+					   &size_params);
+}
+
+static void mlx5_esw_devlink_port_res_unregister(struct devlink_port *dl_port)
+{
+	devl_port_resources_unregister(dl_port);
+}
+
 int mlx5_esw_offloads_devlink_port_register(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, struct mlx5_vport *vport)
 {
 	struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = esw->dev;
@@ -191,6 +218,15 @@ int mlx5_esw_offloads_devlink_port_register(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, struct mlx
 	if (err)
 		goto rate_err;
 
+	if (vport_num == MLX5_VPORT_PF) {
+		err = mlx5_esw_devlink_port_res_register(esw,
+							 &dl_port->dl_port);
+		if (err)
+			mlx5_core_dbg(dev,
+				      "Failed to register port resources: %d\n",
+				       err);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 
 rate_err:
@@ -205,6 +241,7 @@ void mlx5_esw_offloads_devlink_port_unregister(struct mlx5_vport *vport)
 	if (!vport->dl_port)
 		return;
 	dl_port = vport->dl_port;
+	mlx5_esw_devlink_port_res_unregister(&dl_port->dl_port);
 
 	mlx5_esw_qos_vport_update_parent(vport, NULL, NULL);
 	devl_rate_leaf_destroy(&dl_port->dl_port);
-- 
2.53.0