Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E66BD2BEFF5; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 00:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789865243; cv=none; b=RUsUEDRokxD00h1Zb8ZnPvXzfAogpyDQ7dBO1ItCoOY+2/l6SmLyc9LUo5iDJgxyVH9C9FSIjhxvbV20t2rmDr2zTMhZUgU6uV0jvpB5JzXni2r5MiawHzPorYFW/tQJ0JLJZEwruz/GAZ2+TD2tnX2l0pMiuwME7GQg5hW8DHQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789865243; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZYAreQvpUkfjImZwGFcyck1qO1o6goZzI3SdpEy1CxQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gSRuQAb+PFfvnR0FkEH/AkM8C4Kv8WJOAhaGVNRYU9ufnSohHfQyFu6KkTZWXH+6NsefFyUKRyei/EwOIwU/ECzVwMdWQ83/OdpwBMARncEZh5TcQblyx8+g7H/gfLLCMnFFaC7+7pJS3x4BXGI4Zy6sjGM/kWhPyO5xGzDz/2k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cCbJhtrH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cCbJhtrH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFE7A1F0089D; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 00:47:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789865242; bh=UJGrN72spoTIlGHIM8qviJizpeaDoDq4huEc4z65UDE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=cCbJhtrHZcMrdaYjKl0pxarKRE9JD//RCthgGACf2Csm+6DsS8EZxjC0+tEDTAkmi grRJ38H+SeTz6sQ6RJDuDRj1TAX/BG7VEw6nh6xRTC9S1v5f6ODHUOonruBHWnwjwh 7tBO4r6GMgvQp7yipy/MyAG2Oowfc8bPVW6Q8TFTWwTpckKQuZO0XayqHIkKG/F8U8 CTifPC4+VMogjUmfPQfwrDxpPbviI8zi/Lafdseb8W82e9Os2fj5rqkIzc4kWDO33q OxBFiVvMLXMzZLPcV7f31Q4M4RG03GTOeU5heIcLDLesXx+dWerPMtd8cd7Txam/PH fdKj0H0OeS34A== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sasha Levin , patches@lists.linux.dev, David Ahern , Ido Schimmel , Jakub Kicinski , Vegard Nossum , Harshit Mogalapalli Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 0303/1102] ipv6: Honor oif when choosing nexthop for locally generated traffic Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 20:47:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20260920000825.6-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <8ba23b23-e7f7-44fd-8238-1df3756e0c28@oracle.com> References: <20260917151539.408551884@linuxfoundation.org> <20260917151547.226407448@linuxfoundation.org> <8ba23b23-e7f7-44fd-8238-1df3756e0c28@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, Sep 19, 2026 at 07:47:55PM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote: > That commit makes the nexthop-object walker inspect every group member > and retain the best match. In 6.12.y, rt6_nh_find_match() returns the > first improvement, which stops the walk. [...] > I think 6.12.y should take 484bb9d164df before retaining > 436d8d6c4487, thoughts? Dropped from the 6.18, 6.12, 6.6, 6.1, 5.15 and 5.10 queues. I'll requeue it as the full two-patch series with 484bb9d164df in front. -- Thanks, Sasha