From: cotulla@ya.ru Subject: Re: [Q] Guest mode in HVM Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:27:28 +0400 Message-ID: <312941362612448@web11f.yandex.ru> References: <48b776bf823f2b3c978065ccc6bce7b0.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1362612448; bh=MSVpXd03RgImQKWtgzliODw+4i8PaqfNJrvayIQGsNM=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=CbU/lrQRxH38qfL67Hy5+TcCsD3gK+BGzW5WklFG6I9xQ4qNCfGWpYzzvXfl2KGqy kRUzl0FV1Rqrov80p99BQbbFcDco9VdOyeDSt4rnuq0WQEIxMIa4tRFCs92i0eKhPl KwnM2Z6TqmkUmz5rz0C/Bg/iHj9DHBIxtk9T4SMM= In-Reply-To: <48b776bf823f2b3c978065ccc6bce7b0.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" To: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org Hello, > =9ARight, the supervisor isn't subject to RWX bits, but it is still s= ubject > =9Ato ASIDs. =9AI think there was some other nuance to the fault hand= ling, but > =9Athat was the gist of it. That's sadly :( > > =9AThis brings us to hypervisors which we've sort of skirted in other= emails. > =9A=9AThere will be changes in the Hexagon architecture from one vers= ion to > =9Aanother, some of which will affect the guest operation and compati= bility. > =9ALong term, "we" would like to have Linux just deal with the hyperv= isor > =9Ainterface. > > =9AOf course, that isn't useful to anybody without the actual hypervi= sor. =9AWe > =9Arecognize this and are working hard to try to release some version= of a > =9Afunctioning hypervisor for the community to continue tinkering wit= h. =9A Will it be releases as binary or as source code? > If =9Awe get that out, perhaps that will be more preferable for you t= o work > =9Aon... Well, we already [i]somehow[/i] almost got full working ;-) But can be useful for another hobby developers. > =9AThat said, I think it's great that you all are motivated enough to= go for > =9Aa bare metal port in the first place (and it looks like you've mad= e great > =9Aprogress). =9AI see no reason to reject bare metal patches, but we= would > =9Aneed to keep things clean with ifdefs/config switches... > Yes, we got busybox to run rather good as well. Most tests are passed. Under "we" I mean me and Jonpry. I am working with QDSP6v2 (QSD8250B) a= nd he is working with QDSP6v3 (APQ8060). Another question which I want to know - QDSP6 has PIPT cache or VIPT? Best regards, -Cotulla