Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 43C14E00CF1; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:22:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [192.55.52.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E16E00C62 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2017 15:22:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,441,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="316555832" Received: from scchinx-mobl.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.255.141.101]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2017 15:22:47 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Philip Balister Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:22:43 +1300 Message-ID: <3458014.5EK98WmiFs@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation In-Reply-To: References: <1506287141-3998-1-git-send-email-maxin.john@intel.com> <6052844.NaO1fkoddp@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-java][PATCH 5/6] bdwgc: import from meta-oe X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:22:52 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday, 27 September 2017 11:14:21 AM NZDT Philip Balister wrote: > On 09/26/2017 03:59 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Wednesday, 27 September 2017 1:16:19 AM NZDT Philip Balister wrote: > >> Does the layer index let us search for recipes that depend on another > >> recipe? > > > > At the moment, no. I have explicitly not done anything with dependencies > > because they can be dependent on configuration (e.g. DISTRO_FEATURES, > > PACKAGECONFIG) and I haven't taken the time to figure out how to introspect > > and present such optional dependencies. > > Thanks Paul. I was wondering since I suspect that over time, the > question we are asking will become more important. We already ran into a > similar issue with sip. Right, the layer index really is the right place to be doing this. I've filed a bug: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12129 > Maybe it is time for oe-core-not-so-common-depends? I'd think we'd want a bit more definition around what goes into such a layer, that title is pretty vague. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre